Sous embargo jusqu'au 31/03/2018.
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Dismissal of the illusion of uncertainty in the assessment of a likelihood ratio
Law, Probability and Risk
The use of the Bayes factor (BF) or likelihood ratio as a metric to assess the probative value of forensic traces is largely supported by operational standards and recommendations in different forensic disciplines. However, the progress towards more widespread consensus about foundational principles is still fragile as it raises new problems about which views differ. It is not uncommon e.g. to encounter scientists who feel the need to compute the probability distribution of a given expression of evidential value (i.e. a BF), or to place intervals or significance probabilities on such a quantity. The article here presents arguments to show that such views involve a misconception of principles and abuse of language. The conclusion of the discussion is that, in a given case at hand, forensic scientists ought to offer to a court of justice a given single value for the BF, rather than an expression based on a distribution over a range of values.
Bayes factor, likelihood ratio, probability estimation, uncertainty variability, Philosophy, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Law
Web of science
Last modification date