Ionotropic and metabotropic mechanisms in chemoreception: 'chance or design'?

Details

Serval ID
serval:BIB_5185E0A6047E
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Publication sub-type
Review (review): journal as complete as possible of one specific subject, written based on exhaustive analyses from published work.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Ionotropic and metabotropic mechanisms in chemoreception: 'chance or design'?
Journal
EMBO Reports
Author(s)
Silbering A.F., Benton R.
ISSN
1469-3178[electronic], 1469-221X[linking]
Publication state
Published
Issued date
2010
Volume
11
Number
3
Pages
173-179
Language
english
Abstract
Chemosensory receptors convert an enormous diversity of chemical signals from the external world into a common language of electrical activity in the brain. Mammals and insects use several families of transmembrane receptor proteins to recognize distinct classes of volatile and non-volatile chemicals that are produced by conspecifics or other environmental sources. A comparison of the signalling mechanisms of mammalian and insect receptors has revealed an unexpected functional distinction: mammals rely almost exclusively on metabotropic ligand-binding receptors, which use second messenger signalling cascades to indirectly activate ion channels, whereas insects use ionotropic receptors, which are gated directly by chemical stimuli, thereby leading to neuronal depolarization. In this review, we consider possible reasons for this dichotomy, taking into account biophysical, cell biological, ecological and evolutionary influences on how information is extracted from chemosensory cues by these animal classes.
Keywords
olfaction, gustation, receptor, GPCR, ion channel
Pubmed
Web of science
Create date
01/03/2010 16:25
Last modification date
20/08/2019 15:07
Usage data