Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR on a high-throughput molecular diagnostic platform and the cobas SARS-CoV-2 test for the diagnostic of COVID-19 on various clinical samples.
Details
Request a copy Under indefinite embargo.
UNIL restricted access
State: Public
Version: author
License: CC BY-NC 4.0
UNIL restricted access
State: Public
Version: author
License: CC BY-NC 4.0
Serval ID
serval:BIB_50F61B3E6CFD
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR on a high-throughput molecular diagnostic platform and the cobas SARS-CoV-2 test for the diagnostic of COVID-19 on various clinical samples.
Journal
Pathogens and disease
ISSN
2049-632X (Electronic)
ISSN-L
2049-632X
Publication state
Published
Issued date
11/11/2020
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
78
Number
8
Pages
ftaa061
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Comparative Study ; Journal Article
Publication Status: ppublish
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
In order to cope with the rapid spread of the COVID-19 pandemic, we introduced on our in-house high-throughput molecular diagnostic platform (MDx Platform) a real-time reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) to detect the SARS-CoV-2 from any clinical specimens. The aim of this study was to compare the RT-PCR results obtain with the MDx Platform and the commercial assay cobas SARS-CoV-2 (Roche) on nasopharyngeal swab and other clinical specimens including sputum, bronchial aspirate, bronchoalveolar lavage and anal swabs.
Samples received in our laboratory from patients suspected of COVID-19 (n = 262) were tested in parallel with our MDx platform SARS-CoV-2 PCR and with the cobas SARS-CoV-2 test.
The overall agreement between the two tests for all samples tested was 99.24% (260/262), which corresponded to agreements of 100% (178/178) on nasopharyngeal swabs, 95.45% (42/44) on lower respiratory tract specimen with discordant resultS obtained for very high cycle threshold (Ct) value and 100% (40/40) on anorectal swabs. The Ct values for nasopharyngeal swabs displayed an excellent correlation (R2 > 96%) between both tests.
The high agreements between the cobas SARS-CoV-2 test and the MDx platform supports the use of both methods for the diagnostic of COVID-19 on various clinical samples. Very few discrepant results may occur at very low viral load.
Samples received in our laboratory from patients suspected of COVID-19 (n = 262) were tested in parallel with our MDx platform SARS-CoV-2 PCR and with the cobas SARS-CoV-2 test.
The overall agreement between the two tests for all samples tested was 99.24% (260/262), which corresponded to agreements of 100% (178/178) on nasopharyngeal swabs, 95.45% (42/44) on lower respiratory tract specimen with discordant resultS obtained for very high cycle threshold (Ct) value and 100% (40/40) on anorectal swabs. The Ct values for nasopharyngeal swabs displayed an excellent correlation (R2 > 96%) between both tests.
The high agreements between the cobas SARS-CoV-2 test and the MDx platform supports the use of both methods for the diagnostic of COVID-19 on various clinical samples. Very few discrepant results may occur at very low viral load.
Keywords
Betacoronavirus/isolation & purification, COVID-19, Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis, Coronavirus Infections/virology, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing/methods, Humans, Molecular Diagnostic Techniques/instrumentation, Molecular Diagnostic Techniques/methods, Nasopharynx/virology, Pandemics, Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis, Pneumonia, Viral/virology, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods, SARS-CoV-2, RT-PCR, molecular diagnostic, anal swab, anorectal swab, bronchial aspirate, bronchoalveolar lavage, cobas 6800, nasopharyngeal swab
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
26/10/2020 7:39
Last modification date
20/07/2023 5:57