Systematic Assessment of Adult Patients' Satisfaction with Various Eosinophilic Esophagitis Therapies.

Details

Serval ID
serval:BIB_4D00AB9B1F01
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Systematic Assessment of Adult Patients' Satisfaction with Various Eosinophilic Esophagitis Therapies.
Journal
International archives of allergy and immunology
Author(s)
Safroneeva E., Hafner D., Kuehni C.E., Zwahlen M., Trelle S., Biedermann L., Greuter T., Vavricka S.R., Straumann A., Schoepfer A.M.
ISSN
1423-0097 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1018-2438
Publication state
Published
Issued date
2020
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
181
Number
3
Pages
211-220
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
The treatment options for eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) patients include drugs (proton pump inhibitors [PPIs], swallowed topical corticosteroids [STCs]), elimination diets, and dilation. Given the lack of data, we aimed to assess adult EoE patients' satisfaction with different EoE-specific treatment modalities.
We evaluated therapy satisfaction recalled over a 12-month period using the validated Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication that assesses effectiveness, side effects, convenience, and overall satisfaction. The score for each scale ranges from 0 (dissatisfied) to 100 (satisfied). To evaluate satisfaction with nonpharmacologic therapies, the questionnaire was modified and debriefed into three focus groups. The final questionnaire was sent to 147 patients.
The patient response rate was 74%. In the last 12 months, 24, 75, 19, and 9% were treated with PPIs, STCs, elimination diet, and dilation, respectively. Patients identified the following considerations as important for therapy choice: effect on symptoms (89%), effect on esophageal inflammation (76%), side effects (69%), and ease of use (58%). Patients found STCs to be effective (83 points), convenient (83 points), and experienced no side effects when using this therapy. When using STCs alone (43%), overall patient satisfaction was high (86 points). Patients judged PPIs to be most convenient (89 points), STCs to be a bit less convenient (83 points), and diet to be most inconvenient (46 points) of the three therapies examined.
Adult EoE patients consider both therapy effect on symptoms and esophageal inflammation as important criteria when choosing EoE therapy and appear to be satisfied with STC use.
Keywords
Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use, Adult, Diet Therapy, Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/epidemiology, Eosinophilic Esophagitis/epidemiology, Eosinophilic Esophagitis/therapy, Female, Focus Groups, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Satisfaction/statistics & numerical data, Proton Pump Inhibitors/therapeutic use, Surveys and Questionnaires, Switzerland/epidemiology, Eosinophilic esophagitis, Patient governance, Patient satisfaction, Shared decision-making
Pubmed
Web of science
Create date
03/01/2020 16:54
Last modification date
13/02/2024 8:24
Usage data