Prevalence, characteristics, and publication of discontinued randomized trials.

Details

Ressource 1Download: 5_24618966.pdf (737.12 [Ko])
State: Public
Version: Final published version
Serval ID
serval:BIB_4BD40193B614
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Prevalence, characteristics, and publication of discontinued randomized trials.
Journal
Jama
Author(s)
Kasenda B., von Elm E., You J., Blümle A., Tomonaga Y., Saccilotto R., Amstutz A., Bengough T., Meerpohl J.J., Stegert M., Tikkinen K.A., Neumann I., Carrasco-Labra A., Faulhaber M., Mulla S.M., Mertz D., Akl E.A., Bassler D., Busse J.W., Ferreira-González I., Lamontagne F., Nordmann A., Gloy V., Raatz H., Moja L., Rosenthal R., Ebrahim S., Schandelmaier S., Xin S., Vandvik P.O., Johnston B.C., Walter M.A., Burnand B., Schwenkglenks M., Hemkens L.G., Bucher H.C., Guyatt G.H., Briel M.
ISSN
1538-3598 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0098-7484
Publication state
Published
Issued date
2014
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
311
Number
10
Pages
1045-1051
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: The discontinuation of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) raises ethical concerns and often wastes scarce research resources. The epidemiology of discontinued RCTs, however, remains unclear.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence, characteristics, and publication history of discontinued RCTs and to investigate factors associated with RCT discontinuation due to poor recruitment and with nonpublication.
DESIGN AND SETTING: Retrospective cohort of RCTs based on archived protocols approved by 6 research ethics committees in Switzerland, Germany, and Canada between 2000 and 2003. We recorded trial characteristics and planned recruitment from included protocols. Last follow-up of RCTs was April 27, 2013.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Completion status, reported reasons for discontinuation, and publication status of RCTs as determined by correspondence with the research ethics committees, literature searches, and investigator surveys.
RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 11.6 years (range, 8.8-12.6 years), 253 of 1017 included RCTs were discontinued (24.9% [95% CI, 22.3%-27.6%]). Only 96 of 253 discontinuations (37.9% [95% CI, 32.0%-44.3%]) were reported to ethics committees. The most frequent reason for discontinuation was poor recruitment (101/1017; 9.9% [95% CI, 8.2%-12.0%]). In multivariable analysis, industry sponsorship vs investigator sponsorship (8.4% vs 26.5%; odds ratio [OR], 0.25 [95% CI, 0.15-0.43]; P < .001) and a larger planned sample size in increments of 100 (-0.7%; OR, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.92-1.00]; P = .04) were associated with lower rates of discontinuation due to poor recruitment. Discontinued trials were more likely to remain unpublished than completed trials (55.1% vs 33.6%; OR, 3.19 [95% CI, 2.29-4.43]; P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this sample of trials based on RCT protocols from 6 research ethics committees, discontinuation was common, with poor recruitment being the most frequently reported reason. Greater efforts are needed to ensure the reporting of trial discontinuation to research ethics committees and the publication of results of discontinued trials.
Keywords
Canada, Cohort Studies, Ethics Committees, Research, Germany, Humans, Odds Ratio, Patient Selection, Publication Bias, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/ethics, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/statistics & numerical data, Retrospective Studies, Switzerland
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
11/04/2014 18:39
Last modification date
20/08/2019 14:59
Usage data