A management algorithm for patients with intracranial pressure monitoring: the Seattle International Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Consensus Conference (SIBICC).

Details

Ressource 1Download: 31659383_BIB_4B3831C62817.pdf (4791.26 [Ko])
State: Public
Version: Final published version
License: CC BY-NC 4.0
Serval ID
serval:BIB_4B3831C62817
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
A management algorithm for patients with intracranial pressure monitoring: the Seattle International Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Consensus Conference (SIBICC).
Journal
Intensive care medicine
Author(s)
Hawryluk GWJ, Aguilera S., Buki A., Bulger E., Citerio G., Cooper D.J., Arrastia R.D., Diringer M., Figaji A., Gao G., Geocadin R., Ghajar J., Harris O., Hoffer A., Hutchinson P., Joseph M., Kitagawa R., Manley G., Mayer S., Menon D.K., Meyfroidt G., Michael D.B., Oddo M., Okonkwo D., Patel M., Robertson C., Rosenfeld J.V., Rubiano A.M., Sahuquillo J., Servadei F., Shutter L., Stein D., Stocchetti N., Taccone F.S., Timmons S., Tsai E., Ullman J.S., Vespa P., Videtta W., Wright D.W., Zammit C., Chesnut R.M.
ISSN
1432-1238 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0342-4642
Publication state
Published
Issued date
12/2019
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
45
Number
12
Pages
1783-1794
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
Management algorithms for adult severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI) were omitted in later editions of the Brain Trauma Foundation's sTBI Management Guidelines, as they were not evidence-based.
We used a Delphi-method-based consensus approach to address management of sTBI patients undergoing intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring. Forty-two experienced, clinically active sTBI specialists from six continents comprised the panel. Eight surveys iterated queries and comments. An in-person meeting included whole- and small-group discussions and blinded voting. Consensus required 80% agreement. We developed heatmaps based on a traffic-light model where panelists' decision tendencies were the focus of recommendations.
We provide comprehensive algorithms for ICP-monitor-based adult sTBI management. Consensus established 18 interventions as fundamental and ten treatments not to be used. We provide a three-tier algorithm for treating elevated ICP. Treatments within a tier are considered empirically equivalent. Higher tiers involve higher risk therapies. Tiers 1, 2, and 3 include 10, 4, and 3 interventions, respectively. We include inter-tier considerations, and recommendations for critical neuroworsening to assist the recognition and treatment of declining patients. Novel elements include guidance for autoregulation-based ICP treatment based on MAP Challenge results, and two heatmaps to guide (1) ICP-monitor removal and (2) consideration of sedation holidays for neurological examination.
Our modern and comprehensive sTBI-management protocol is designed to assist clinicians managing sTBI patients monitored with ICP-monitors alone. Consensus-based (class III evidence), it provides management recommendations based on combined expert opinion. It reflects neither a standard-of-care nor a substitute for thoughtful individualized management.
Keywords
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Algorithms, Brain Injuries, Traumatic/diagnosis, Brain Injuries, Traumatic/physiopathology, Consensus Development Conferences as Topic, Female, Humans, Intracranial Hypertension/diagnosis, Intracranial Hypertension/physiopathology, Male, Middle Aged, Monitoring, Physiologic/methods, Monitoring, Physiologic/standards, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Algorithm, Brain injury, Consensus, Head trauma, Intracranial pressure, Protocol, SIBICC, Seattle, Tiers
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
04/01/2020 14:46
Last modification date
12/01/2022 8:09
Usage data