Pilot tone navigation for respiratory and cardiac motion-resolved free-running 5D flow MRI.

Details

Ressource 1Download: 34611923_BIB_4B0D03AEECF3.pdf (3672.28 [Ko])
State: Public
Version: Final published version
License: CC BY 4.0
Serval ID
serval:BIB_4B0D03AEECF3
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Pilot tone navigation for respiratory and cardiac motion-resolved free-running 5D flow MRI.
Journal
Magnetic resonance in medicine
Author(s)
Falcão MBL, Di Sopra L., Ma L., Bacher M., Yerly J., Speier P., Rutz T., Prša M., Markl M., Stuber M., Roy C.W.
ISSN
1522-2594 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0740-3194
Publication state
Published
Issued date
02/2022
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
87
Number
2
Pages
718-732
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article ; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
In this work, we integrated the pilot tone (PT) navigation system into a reconstruction framework for respiratory and cardiac motion-resolved 5D flow. We tested the hypotheses that PT would provide equivalent respiratory curves, cardiac triggers, and corresponding flow measurements to a previously established self-gating (SG) technique while being independent from changes to the acquisition parameters.
Fifteen volunteers and 9 patients were scanned with a free-running 5D flow sequence, with PT integrated. Respiratory curves and cardiac triggers from PT and SG were compared across all subjects. Flow measurements from 5D flow reconstructions using both PT and SG were compared to each other and to a reference electrocardiogram-gated and respiratory triggered 4D flow acquisition. Radial trajectories with variable readouts per interleave were also tested in 1 subject to compare cardiac trigger quality between PT and SG.
The correlation between PT and SG respiratory curves were 0.95 ± 0.06 for volunteers and 0.95 ± 0.04 for patients. Heartbeat duration measurements in volunteers and patients showed a bias to electrocardiogram measurements of, respectively, 0.16 ± 64.94 ms and 0.01 ± 39.29 ms for PT versus electrocardiogram and of 0.24 ± 63.68 ms and 0.09 ± 32.79 ms for SG versus electrocardiogram. No significant differences were reported for the flow measurements between 5D flow PT and from 5D flow SG. A decrease in the cardiac triggering quality of SG was observed for increasing readouts per interleave, whereas PT quality remained constant.
PT has been successfully integrated in 5D flow MRI and has shown equivalent results to the previously described 5D flow SG technique, while being completely acquisition-independent.
Keywords
Electrocardiography, Heart/diagnostic imaging, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Motion, Respiration, Respiratory Rate, 5D flow MRI, cardiac motion, free-running, pilot tone, respiratory motion
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
12/10/2021 9:40
Last modification date
23/01/2024 8:24
Usage data