The Neurostimulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee (NACC) Safety Guidelines for the Reduction of Severe Neurological Injury

Details

Serval ID
serval:BIB_4A650CEA6019
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Publication sub-type
Review (review): journal as complete as possible of one specific subject, written based on exhaustive analyses from published work.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
The Neurostimulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee (NACC) Safety Guidelines for the Reduction of Severe Neurological Injury
Journal
Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface
Author(s)
Deer T.R., Lamer T.J., Pope J.E., Falowski S.M., Provenzano D.A., Slavin K., Golovac S., Arle J., Rosenow J.M., Williams K., McRoberts P., Narouze S., Eldabe S., Lad S.P., De Andrés J.A., Buchser E., Rigoard P., Levy R.M., Simpson B., Mekhail N.
ISSN
1525-1403 (Online)
1094-7159 (Print)
Publication state
Published
Issued date
01/2017
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
20
Number
1
Pages
15-30
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
Neurostimulation involves the implantation of devices to stimulate the brain, spinal cord, or peripheral or cranial nerves for the purpose of modulating the neural activity of the targeted structures to achieve specific therapeutic effects. Surgical placement of neurostimulation devices is associated with risks of neurologic injury, as well as possible sequelae from the local or systemic effects of the intervention. The goal of the Neurostimulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee (NACC) is to improve the safety of neurostimulation.
The International Neuromodulation Society (INS) is dedicated to improving neurostimulation efficacy and patient safety. Over the past two decades the INS has established a process to use best evidence to improve care. This article updates work published by the NACC in 2014. NACC authors were chosen based on nomination to the INS executive board and were selected based on publications, academic acumen, international impact, and diversity. In areas in which evidence was lacking, the NACC used expert opinion to reach consensus.
The INS has developed recommendations that when properly utilized should improve patient safety and reduce the risk of injury and associated complications with implantable devices.
On behalf of INS, the NACC has published recommendations intended to reduce the risk of neurological injuries and complications while implanting stimulators.

Keywords
Consensus, Electric Stimulation Therapy methods, Electric Stimulation Therapy standards, Evidence-Based Medicine, Humans, Nervous System Diseases therapy, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Professional Staff Committees standards
Pubmed
Web of science
Create date
10/01/2017 18:10
Last modification date
20/08/2019 13:58
Usage data