Effects of Teriparatide, Denosumab, or Both on Spine Trabecular Microarchitecture in DATA-Switch: a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Details

Serval ID
serval:BIB_493A5F39A458
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Effects of Teriparatide, Denosumab, or Both on Spine Trabecular Microarchitecture in DATA-Switch: a Randomized Controlled Trial.
Journal
Journal of clinical densitometry
Author(s)
Tsai J.N., Jiang L.A., Lee H., Hans D., Leder B.Z.
ISSN
1094-6950 (Print)
ISSN-L
1094-6950
Publication state
Published
Issued date
2017
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
20
Number
4
Pages
507-512
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article ; Randomized Controlled Trial
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
In postmenopausal women, 2 yr of combined teriparatide and denosumab increases bone mineral density more than either drug alone, and switching from either combination or teriparatide to denosumab for an additional 2 yr further increases bone mineral density. Conversely, switching from denosumab to teriparatide results in transient bone loss. The effects of these interventions on spine microarchitecture are unknown. In the DATA and DATA-Switch studies, 94 postmenopausal osteoporotic women were randomized to receive 24 mo of teriparatide (20 µg daily), denosumab (60 mg every 6 mo), or both. Then, women originally assigned to 24 mo of teriparatide received 24 mo of denosumab, whereas subjects originally randomized to 24 mo of denosumab received 24 mo of teriparatide. Subjects who received both drugs received an additional 24 mo of denosumab alone. Spine trabecular bone score (TBS, a gray-level textural assessment of bone microarchitecture) was measured blinded from treatment groups using images from 2-dimensional dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry spine scans at 0, 12, 24, 30, 36, and 48 mo in 65 women who had posterior-anterior spine dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry images suitable for TBS analysis. After 24 mo, TBS increased by 2.7 ± 4.7% in the teriparatide group (p = 0.009 vs baseline), by 1.8 ± 5.0% in the denosumab group (p = 0.118 vs baseline), and by 4.5 ± 6.7% in the combination group (p = 0.017 vs baseline), with no significant between-group differences. In the 6 mo after the treatments were switched (months 24-30), TBS continued to increase in the combination-to-denosumab and teriparatide-to-denosumab groups but decreased by -1.1 ± 4.0% in the denosumab-to-teriparatide group (p < 0.05 vs other groups). After 48 mo, compared to month 0, TBS increased by 5.1 ± 5.8% in the teriparatide-to-denosumab group, by 3.6 ± 4.2% in the denosumab-to-teriparatide group, and by 6.1 ± 4.7% in the combination-to-denosumab group (p < 0.001 vs baseline for all groups, p = not significant for between-group differences). Switching from teriparatide to denosumab also increased spine TBS. Conversely, switching from denosumab to teriparatide transiently degraded spine trabecular microarchitecture, the clinical consequences of which require further study.
Keywords
Absorptiometry, Photon, Aged, Bone Density/drug effects, Bone Density Conservation Agents/pharmacology, Cancellous Bone/diagnostic imaging, Cancellous Bone/drug effects, Cancellous Bone/physiology, Denosumab/pharmacology, Denosumab/therapeutic use, Drug Substitution, Drug Therapy, Combination, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Osteoporosis/drug therapy, Postmenopause, Single-Blind Method, Teriparatide/pharmacology, Teriparatide/therapeutic use, Denosumab, osteoporosis, teriparatide
Pubmed
Web of science
Create date
26/06/2017 11:26
Last modification date
20/08/2019 14:56
Usage data