Computer tomography assessment of pedicle screw insertion in percutaneous posterior transpedicular stabilization.

Details

Serval ID
serval:BIB_44D5B956D5DB
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Computer tomography assessment of pedicle screw insertion in percutaneous posterior transpedicular stabilization.
Journal
European Spine Journal
Author(s)
Schizas C., Michel J., Kosmopoulos V., Theumann N.
ISSN
0940-6719
Publication state
Published
Issued date
2007
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
16
Number
5
Pages
613-617
Language
english
Notes
Clinical Trial Schizas, Constantin Michel, Jacky Kosmopoulos, Victor Theumann, Nicolas Germany European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society Eur Spine J. 2007 May;16(5):613-7. Epub 2006 Sep 12. --- Old month value: May
Abstract
Percutaneous insertion of cannulated pedicle screws has been recently developed as a minimally invasive alternative to the open technique during instrumented fusion procedures. Given the reported rate of screw misplacement using open techniques (up to 40%), we considered it important to analyze possible side effects of this new technique. Placement of 60 pedicle screws in 15 consecutive patients undergoing lumbar or lumbosacral fusion, mainly for spondylolisthesis, were analyzed. Axial, coronal, and sagittal reformatted computer tomography images were examined by three observers. Individual and consensus interpretation was obtained for each screw position. Along with frank penetration, we also looked at cortical encroachment of the pedicular wall by the screw. Thirteen percent of the patients (2/15) had severe frank penetration from the screws, while 80% of them (12/15) had some perforation. On axial images the incidence of severe frank pedicle penetration was 3.3% while the overall rate of screw perforation was 23%. In coronal images the overall screw perforation rate rose to 30% while the rate of severe frank pedicle penetration remained unchanged. One patient (6.6%) suffered S1 root symptoms due to a frankly medially misplaced screw, requiring re-operation. This study has shown that percutaneous insertion of cannulated pedicle screws in the lumbar spine is an acceptable procedure. The overall rate of perforation in axial images is below the higher rates reported in the literature but does remain important. Frank penetration of the pedicle was nevertheless low. It remains a demanding technique and has to be performed with extreme care to detail.
Keywords
Bone Screws, Humans, Lumbar Vertebrae, Observer Variation, Postoperative Complications, Spinal Fusion, Spondylolisthesis, Surgical Procedures, Minimally Invasive, Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Pubmed
Web of science
Create date
11/04/2008 13:00
Last modification date
20/08/2019 14:49
Usage data