Méta-analyse et efficacité des psychothérapies : Faits et fictions

Détails

Ressource 1Télécharger: BIB_43DA246E782E.P001.pdf (210.20 [Ko])
Etat: Public
Version: de l'auteur
ID Serval
serval:BIB_43DA246E782E
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Titre
Méta-analyse et efficacité des psychothérapies : Faits et fictions
Périodique
Psychologie Française
Auteur(s)
Zimmermann G., Pomini V.
ISSN
0033-2984
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
2013
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
58
Numéro
3
Pages
167-175
Langue
français
Résumé
In a political environment increasingly concerned with the problem of escalating health care costs, the issue of psychotherapy efficacy evaluation is still debated. Historically, this debate started after Eysenck (1952) published a famous article suggesting that average improvement from pre- to post-therapy has nothing to do with psychotherapy participation, but something that would tend to happen anyway ("spontaneous remission"). Wanting to prove that psychotherapy was effective (Glass, 2000), Smith and Glass (1977) published the first meta-analysis of the psychotherapy efficacy, combining the results of several controlled clinical trials, and found that psychotherapy was remarkably efficacious. Following a brief historical introduction, the objectives of this paper is to define the principles of meta-analysis, to discuss of epistemological contextualization of this methodological approach, and finally to examine the interest and limits of the application of this method in the field of evaluation of psychotherapy.
Mots-clé
psychotherapy, efficacy, meta-analysis, methodology, evidence-based psychology
Open Access
Oui
Création de la notice
12/11/2012 10:50
Dernière modification de la notice
20/08/2019 13:47
Données d'usage