Renal recovery after acute kidney injury: choice of initial renal replacement therapy modality still matters.

Détails

Ressource 1Télécharger: 25042793_BIB_41284DA2365B.pdf (184.93 [Ko])
Etat: Serval
Version: Final published version
ID Serval
serval:BIB_41284DA2365B
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Sous-type
Lettre (letter): communication adressée à l'éditeur.
Collection
Publications
Titre
Renal recovery after acute kidney injury: choice of initial renal replacement therapy modality still matters.
Périodique
Critical Care
Auteur(s)
Schneider A.G., Bagshaw S.M.
ISSN
1466-609X (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1364-8535
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
2014
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
18
Numéro
3
Pages
154
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article Publication Status: epublish, pdf : Commentary
Résumé
Renal replacement therapy can be applied either in an intermittent fashion or in a continuous fashion in severe acute kidney injury. To date, no modality has been shown to consistently improve patient survival. In the study recently reported by Sun and colleagues, continuous application of renal replacement therapy was associated with improved renal recovery, defined by lower risk of long-term need for chronic dialysis therapy. This association between nonrecovery and intermittent renal replacement therapy may be explained by a higher rate of hypotensive episodes and the lower capacity for fluid removal during the first 72 hours of therapy. Altogether, this study adds to the growing body of evidence to suggest improved likelihood of recovery of kidney function in critically ill survivors of AKI with continuous modalities for renal replacement therapy.
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Oui
Création de la notice
26/11/2014 21:58
Dernière modification de la notice
08/05/2019 17:39
Données d'usage