Reconstruction of Spinal Soft Tissue Defects With Perforator Flaps From the Paraspinal Region.
Details
Serval ID
serval:BIB_3F6D5AAEFBED
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Reconstruction of Spinal Soft Tissue Defects With Perforator Flaps From the Paraspinal Region.
Journal
In vivo
ISSN
1791-7549 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0258-851X
Publication state
Published
Issued date
2019
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
33
Number
3
Pages
827-832
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: ppublish
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
Reconstruction of spinal soft tissue defects is challenging, especially when neural structures or prosthetic material are exposed. They should be covered with well-vascularized tissue such as paraspinal perforator flaps.
This is a retrospective study of soft tissue reconstructions with paraspinal perforator flaps from 2011 to 2018. The technique is described and risk factors for poor wound healing were assessed. Postoperative complications are reported.
Twenty patients with a mean age of 63.65 years were included. Defects had an average size of 47 cm <sup>2</sup> and were mainly located in the lumbosacral region (9 patients). Twelve patients suffered from infection following spinal stabilization, seven of whom were diagnosed with osteomyelitis, two patients presented with pressure sore and one patient experienced wound dehiscence. One partial flap necrosis with a lumbar defect occurred, which required revision surgery. No total flap loss occurred. Stable, closed wounds were achieved at their final follow-up.
Perforator paraspinal flaps are suitable for immediate reconstruction of spinal defects.
This is a retrospective study of soft tissue reconstructions with paraspinal perforator flaps from 2011 to 2018. The technique is described and risk factors for poor wound healing were assessed. Postoperative complications are reported.
Twenty patients with a mean age of 63.65 years were included. Defects had an average size of 47 cm <sup>2</sup> and were mainly located in the lumbosacral region (9 patients). Twelve patients suffered from infection following spinal stabilization, seven of whom were diagnosed with osteomyelitis, two patients presented with pressure sore and one patient experienced wound dehiscence. One partial flap necrosis with a lumbar defect occurred, which required revision surgery. No total flap loss occurred. Stable, closed wounds were achieved at their final follow-up.
Perforator paraspinal flaps are suitable for immediate reconstruction of spinal defects.
Keywords
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Perforator Flap, Reconstructive Surgical Procedures/adverse effects, Reconstructive Surgical Procedures/methods, Risk Factors, Spinal Injuries/etiology, Spinal Injuries/surgery, Treatment Outcome, Dorsal midline defect, fasciocutaneous flaps, osteomyelitis
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
13/05/2019 7:38
Last modification date
12/09/2019 5:10