Sex differences in survival following surgery for esophageal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Details

Serval ID
serval:BIB_3F0B03571536
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Sex differences in survival following surgery for esophageal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Journal
Diseases of the esophagus
Author(s)
Liatsou E., Bellos I., Katsaros I., Michailidou S., Karela N.R., Mantziari S., Rouvelas I., Schizas D.
ISSN
1442-2050 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1120-8694
Publication state
Published
Issued date
28/10/2024
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
37
Number
11
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article ; Systematic Review ; Meta-Analysis
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
The impact of sex on the prognosis of patients with esophageal cancer remains unclear. Evidence supports that sex- based disparities in esophageal cancer survival could be attributed to sex- specific risk exposures, such as age at diagnosis, race, socioeconomic status, smoking, drinking, and histological type. The aim of our study is to investigate the role of sex disparities in survival of patients who underwent surgery for esophageal cancer. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the existing literature in PubMed, EMBASE, and CENTRAL from December 1966 to February 2023, was held. Studies that reported sex-related differences in survival outcomes of patients who underwent esophagectomy for esophageal cancer were identified. A total of 314 studies were included in the quantitative analysis. Statistically significant results derived from 1-year and 2-year overall survival pooled analysis with Relative Risk (RR) 0.93 (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.90-0.97, I2 = 52.00) and 0.90 (95% CI: 0.85-0.95, I2 = 0.00), respectively (RR < 1 = favorable for men). In the postoperative complications analysis, statistically significant results concerned anastomotic leak and heart complications, RR: 1.08 (95% CI: 1.01-1.16) and 0.62 (95% CI: 0.52-0.75), respectively. Subgroup analysis was performed among studies with <200 and > 200 patients, histology types, study continent and publication year. Overall, sex tends to be an independent prognostic factor for esophageal carcinoma. However, unanimous results seem rather obscure when multivariable analysis and subgroup analysis occurred. More prospective studies and gender-specific protocols should be conducted to better understand the modifying role of sex in esophageal cancer prognosis.
Keywords
Humans, Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery, Esophageal Neoplasms/mortality, Esophagectomy/mortality, Female, Male, Sex Factors, Postoperative Complications/epidemiology, Postoperative Complications/etiology, Postoperative Complications/mortality, Middle Aged, Aged, Prognosis, Risk Factors, Survival Analysis, Adult, Survival Rate, disparities, esophageal cancer, prognosis, sex, surgery
Pubmed
Web of science
Create date
19/08/2024 9:31
Last modification date
05/11/2024 7:13
Usage data