Acute imaging does not improve ASTRAL score's accuracy despite having a prognostic value.

Details

Ressource 1Download: BIB_3EDBC8ECE60C.P001.pdf (109.14 [Ko])
State: Public
Version: Final published version
Serval ID
serval:BIB_3EDBC8ECE60C
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Acute imaging does not improve ASTRAL score's accuracy despite having a prognostic value.
Journal
International Journal of Stroke : Official Journal of the International Stroke Society
Author(s)
Ntaios G., Papavasileiou V., Faouzi M., Vanacker P., Wintermark M., Michel P.
ISSN
1747-4949 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1747-4930
Publication state
Published
Issued date
2014
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
9
Number
7
Pages
926-931
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal ArticlePublication Status: ppublish
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The ASTRAL score was recently shown to reliably predict three-month functional outcome in patients with acute ischemic stroke.
AIM: The study aims to investigate whether information from multimodal imaging increases ASTRAL score's accuracy.
METHODS: All patients registered in the ASTRAL registry until March 2011 were included. In multivariate logistic-regression analyses, we added covariates derived from parenchymal, vascular, and perfusion imaging to the 6-parameter model of the ASTRAL score. If a specific imaging covariate remained an independent predictor of three-month modified Rankin score > 2, the area-under-the-curve (AUC) of this new model was calculated and compared with ASTRAL score's AUC. We also performed similar logistic regression analyses in arbitrarily chosen patient subgroups.
RESULTS: When added to the ASTRAL score, the following covariates on admission computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging-based multimodal imaging were not significant predictors of outcome: any stroke-related acute lesion, any nonstroke-related lesions, chronic/subacute stroke, leukoaraiosis, significant arterial pathology in ischemic territory on computed tomography angiography/magnetic resonance angiography/Doppler, significant intracranial arterial pathology in ischemic territory, and focal hypoperfusion on perfusion-computed tomography. The Alberta Stroke Program Early CT score on plain imaging and any significant extracranial arterial pathology on computed tomography angiography/magnetic resonance angiography/Doppler were independent predictors of outcome (odds ratio: 0·93, 95% CI: 0·87-0·99 and odds ratio: 1·49, 95% CI: 1·08-2·05, respectively) but did not increase ASTRAL score's AUC (0·849 vs. 0·850, and 0·8563 vs. 0·8564, respectively). In exploratory analyses in subgroups of different prognosis, age or stroke severity, no covariate was found to increase ASTRAL score's AUC, either.
CONCLUSIONS: The addition of information derived from multimodal imaging does not increase ASTRAL score's accuracy to predict functional outcome despite having an independent prognostic value. More selected radiological parameters applied in specific subgroups of stroke patients may add prognostic value of multimodal imaging.
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
30/10/2014 18:27
Last modification date
20/08/2019 14:35
Usage data