Development of the Huddle Observation Tool for structured case management discussions to improve situation awareness on inpatient clinical wards

Details

Serval ID
serval:BIB_3EA874365EBD
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Title
Development of the Huddle Observation Tool for structured case management discussions to improve situation awareness on inpatient clinical wards
Journal
BMJ Qual Saf
Author(s)
Edbrooke-Childs J., Hayes J., Sharples E., Gondek D., Stapley E., Sevdalis N., Lachman P., Deighton J.
ISSN
2044-5423 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
2044-5415
Publication state
Published
Issued date
05/2018
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
27
Number
5
Pages
365-372
Language
english
Notes
Edbrooke-Childs, Julian
Hayes, Jacqueline
Sharples, Evelyn
Gondek, Dawid
Stapley, Emily
Sevdalis, Nick
Lachman, Peter
Deighton, Jessica
eng
Department of Health/United Kingdom
Observational Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
England
BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 May;27(5):365-372. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006513. Epub 2017 Sep 19.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: 'Situation Awareness For Everyone' (SAFE) was a 3-year project which aimed to improve situation awareness in clinical teams in order to detect potential deterioration and other potential risks to children on hospital wards. The key intervention was the 'huddle', a structured case management discussion which is central to facilitating situation awareness. This study aimed to develop an observational assessment tool to assess the team processes occurring during huddles, including the effectiveness of the huddle. METHODS: A cross-sectional observational design was used to psychometrically develop the 'Huddle Observation Tool' (HOT) over three phases using standardised psychometric methodology. Huddles were observed across four NHS paediatric wards participating in SAFE by five researchers; two wards within specialist children hospitals and two within district general hospitals, with location, number of beds and length of stay considered to make the sample as heterogeneous as possible. Inter-rater reliability was calculated using the weighted kappa and intraclass correlation coefficient. RESULTS: Inter-rater reliability was acceptable for the collaborative culture (weighted kappa=0.32, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.42), environment items (weighted kappa=0.78, 95% CI 0.52 to 1) and total score (intraclass correlation coefficient=0.87, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.95). It was lower for the structure and risk management items, suggesting that these were more variable in how observers rated them. However, agreement on the global score for huddles was acceptable. CONCLUSION: We developed an observational assessment tool to assess the team processes occurring during huddles, including the effectiveness of the huddle. Future research should examine whether observational evaluations of huddles are associated with other indicators of safety on clinical wards (eg, safety climate and incidents of patient harm), and whether scores on the HOT are associated with improved situation awareness and reductions in deterioration and adverse events in clinical settings, such as inpatient wards.
Keywords
*Awareness, Case Management/*organization & administration, Child, Clinical Deterioration, *Communication, Cooperative Behavior, Cross-Sectional Studies, *Group Processes, Hospital Bed Capacity, Hospitals, District/organization & administration, Hospitals, Pediatric/organization & administration, Humans, Inpatients, Length of Stay, Patient Care Team/*organization & administration, Patient Safety, Psychometrics, Reproducibility of Results, Risk Assessment, Risk Factors, State Medicine, *healthcare quality improvement, *patient safety, *safety culture
Pubmed
Create date
28/09/2023 8:29
Last modification date
10/10/2023 10:39
Usage data