Dose-dense temozolomide for newly diagnosed glioblastoma: a randomized phase III clinical trial.

Details

Serval ID
serval:BIB_3E4FD6695E12
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Dose-dense temozolomide for newly diagnosed glioblastoma: a randomized phase III clinical trial.
Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Author(s)
Gilbert M.R., Wang M., Aldape K.D., Stupp R., Hegi M.E., Jaeckle K.A., Armstrong T.S., Wefel J.S., Won M., Blumenthal D.T., Mahajan A., Schultz C.J., Erridge S., Baumert B., Hopkins K.I., Tzuk-Shina T., Brown P.D., Chakravarti A., Curran W.J., Mehta M.P.
ISSN
1527-7755 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0732-183X
Publication state
Published
Issued date
2013
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
31
Number
32
Pages
4085-4091
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Clinical Trial, Phase III ; Journal Article ; Randomized Controlled TrialPublication Status: ppublish
Abstract
PURPOSE: Radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide is the standard of care for newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM). O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) methylation status may be an important determinant of treatment response. Dose-dense (DD) temozolomide results in prolonged depletion of MGMT in blood mononuclear cells and possibly in tumor. This trial tested whether DD temozolomide improves overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with newly diagnosed GBM.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: This phase III trial enrolled patients older than age 18 years with a Karnofsky performance score of ≥ 60 with adequate tissue. Stratification included clinical factors and tumor MGMT methylation status. Patients were randomly assigned to standard temozolomide (arm 1) or DD temozolomide (arm 2) for 6 to 12 cycles. The primary end point was OS. Secondary analyses evaluated the impact of MGMT status.
RESULTS: A total of 833 patients were randomly assigned to either arm 1 or arm 2 (1,173 registered). No statistically significant difference was observed between arms for median OS (16.6 v 14.9 months, respectively; hazard ratio [HR], 1.03; P = .63) or median PFS (5.5 v 6.7 months; HR, 0.87; P = .06). Efficacy did not differ by methylation status. MGMT methylation was associated with improved OS (21.2 v 14 months; HR, 1.74; P < .001), PFS (8.7 v 5.7 months; HR, 1.63; P < .001), and response (P = .012). There was increased grade ≥ 3 toxicity in arm 2 (34% v 53%; P < .001), mostly lymphopenia and fatigue.
CONCLUSION: This study did not demonstrate improved efficacy for DD temozolomide for newly diagnosed GBM, regardless of methylation status. However, it did confirm the prognostic significance of MGMT methylation. Feasibility of large-scale accrual, prospective tumor collection, and molecular stratification was demonstrated.
Keywords
Aged, Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating/administration & dosage, Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating/adverse effects, Brain Neoplasms/drug therapy, Brain Neoplasms/genetics, Chemoradiotherapy, DNA Methylation, DNA Modification Methylases/genetics, DNA Repair Enzymes/genetics, Dacarbazine/administration & dosage, Dacarbazine/adverse effects, Disease-Free Survival, Female, Glioblastoma/drug therapy, Glioblastoma/genetics, Humans, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Male, Middle Aged, Proportional Hazards Models, Tumor Suppressor Proteins/genetics
Pubmed
Web of science
Create date
07/03/2014 19:00
Last modification date
20/08/2019 14:34
Usage data