A systematic review of discontinued trials suggested that most reasons for recruitment failure were preventable.
Details
Serval ID
serval:BIB_3DB64E15FBB0
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
A systematic review of discontinued trials suggested that most reasons for recruitment failure were preventable.
Journal
Journal of clinical epidemiology
ISSN
1878-5921 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0895-4356
Publication state
Published
Issued date
12/2016
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
80
Pages
8-15
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article ; Review
Publication Status: ppublish
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
To collect and classify reported reasons for recruitment failure in discontinued randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and to assess reporting quality.
We systematically searched MEDLINE and EMBASE (2010-2014) and a previous cohort of RCTs for published RCTs reporting trial discontinuation due to poor recruitment. Teams of two investigators selected eligible RCTs working independently and extracted information using standardized forms. We used an iterative approach to classify reasons for poor recruitment.
We included 172 RCTs discontinued due to poor recruitment (including 26 conference abstracts and 63 industry-funded RCTs). Of those, 131 (76%) reported one or more reasons for discontinuation due to poor recruitment. We identified 28 different reasons for recruitment failure; most frequently mentioned were overestimation of prevalence of eligible participants and prejudiced views of recruiters and participants on trial interventions. Few RCTs reported relevant details about the recruitment process such as how eligible participants were identified, the number of patients assessed for eligibility, and who actually recruited participants.
Our classification could serve as a checklist to assist investigators in the planning of RCTs. Most reasons for recruitment failure seem preventable with a pilot study that applies the planned informed consent procedure.
We systematically searched MEDLINE and EMBASE (2010-2014) and a previous cohort of RCTs for published RCTs reporting trial discontinuation due to poor recruitment. Teams of two investigators selected eligible RCTs working independently and extracted information using standardized forms. We used an iterative approach to classify reasons for poor recruitment.
We included 172 RCTs discontinued due to poor recruitment (including 26 conference abstracts and 63 industry-funded RCTs). Of those, 131 (76%) reported one or more reasons for discontinuation due to poor recruitment. We identified 28 different reasons for recruitment failure; most frequently mentioned were overestimation of prevalence of eligible participants and prejudiced views of recruiters and participants on trial interventions. Few RCTs reported relevant details about the recruitment process such as how eligible participants were identified, the number of patients assessed for eligibility, and who actually recruited participants.
Our classification could serve as a checklist to assist investigators in the planning of RCTs. Most reasons for recruitment failure seem preventable with a pilot study that applies the planned informed consent procedure.
Keywords
Epidemiologic Research Design, Humans, Lost to Follow-Up, Patient Selection, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/methods, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/statistics & numerical data, Early termination of clinical trials, Poor recruitment, Randomized controlled trials as topic, Reasons for recruitment failure, Reporting quality, Systematic review
Pubmed
Web of science
Create date
12/08/2016 7:50
Last modification date
20/08/2019 13:34