Working with wood in rivers in the Western United States

Details

Ressource 1Download: 2024_Ockelford et al_River Research Apps.pdf (3960.40 [Ko])
State: Public
Version: Final published version
License: CC BY 4.0
Serval ID
serval:BIB_3BE89DD87AE0
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Working with wood in rivers in the Western United States
Journal
River Research and Applications
Author(s)
Ockelford Annie, Wohl Ellen, Ruiz-Villanueva Virginia, Comiti Francesco, Piégay Hervé, Darby Stephen, Parsons Dan, Yochum Steven E., Wolstenholme Josh, White Daniel, Uno Hiromi, Triantafillou Shayla, Stroth Travis, Smrdel Tom, Scott Daniel N., Scamardo Julianne E., Rees James, Rathburn Sara, Morrison Ryan R., Milan David, Marshall Anna, Lininger Katherine B., Kemper John T., Karpack Marissa, Johaneman Taylor, Iskin Emily, Gibaja del Hoyo Javier, Hortobágyi Borbála, Hinshaw Sarah, Heath Jared, Emmanuel Tracy, Dunn Sarah, Christensen Nicholas, Beeby Johannes, Ash Julie, Ader Ethan, Aarnink Janbert
ISSN
1535-1459
1535-1467
Publication state
Published
Issued date
18/06/2024
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Language
english
Abstract
Recognition of the important physical and ecological roles played by large wood in channels and on floodplains has grown substantially during recent decades. Although large wood continues to be routinely removed from many river corridors worldwide, the practice of wood reintroduction has spread across the United States, the United Kingdom and western Europe, Australia, and New Zealand. The state-of-science regarding working with wood in rivers was discussed during a workshop held in Colorado, USA, in September 2022 with 40 participants who are scientists and practitioners from across the USA, UK, Europe, and Japan. The objectives of this paper are to present the findings from the workshop; summarize two case studies of wood in river restoration in the western United States; and provide suggestions for advancing the practice of wood in river management. We summarize the workshop results based on participant judgements and recommendations with respect to: (i) limitations and key barriers to using wood, which reflect perceptions and practicalities; (ii) gaps in the use of large wood in river management; (iii) scenarios in which wood is generally used effectively; and (iv) scenarios in which wood is generally not used effectively. The case studies illustrate the importance of the local geomorphic context, the configuration complexity of the wood, and the potential for modification of river corridor morphology to enhance desired benefits. Moving forward, we stress the importance of collaboration across disciplines and across communities of research scientists, practitioners, regulators, and potential stakeholders; accounting for stakeholder perceptions of the use of large wood; and increasing non-scientist access to the latest state-of-science knowledge.
Keywords
engineered logjams, large wood, natural flood management, nature-based solutions, practitioners, stage zero restoration
Web of science
Create date
11/07/2024 14:20
Last modification date
16/07/2024 7:12
Usage data