Diagnostic usefulness of plexus magnetic resonance imaging in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculopathy without electrodiagnostic criteria of demyelination.

Details

Serval ID
serval:BIB_38B22CAEC6DF
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Diagnostic usefulness of plexus magnetic resonance imaging in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculopathy without electrodiagnostic criteria of demyelination.
Journal
European journal of neurology
Author(s)
Fargeot G., Viala K., Theaudin M., Labeyrie M.A., Costa R., Léger J.M., Adams D., Vandendries C., Labeyrie C.
ISSN
1468-1331 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1351-5101
Publication state
Published
Issued date
04/2019
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
26
Number
4
Pages
631-638
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
The usefulness of plexus magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the diagnosis of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculopathy (CIDP) without definite European Federation of Neurological Societies/Peripheral Nerve Society (EFNS/PNS) electrodiagnostic criteria is currently unclear.
Data from consecutive patients with clinical manifestations suggesting CIDP, with or without (CIDP-D and CIDP-ND, respectively) definite EFNS/PNS electrodiagnostic criteria, and referred for plexus MRI in our imaging centre were retrospectively analysed. An expert committee of neurologists compared the level of suspicion of CIDP in CIDP-ND patients to the blinded/unblinded MRI findings. Plexus MRI was reviewed by a neuroradiologist blinded to the final diagnosis.
In all, 38 patients were assessed with suspected CIDP-ND [7/38 (18%) probable; 13/38 (34%) possible; 18/38 (47%), no EFNS/PNS electrodiagnostic criteria], plus 10 with CIDP-D. Thirty-six of the 38 (95%) fulfilled clinical criteria of CIDP variants, including pure sensory neuropathy in 22/36 (61%). Plexus MRI showed abnormalities in 22/38 (58%) patients including increased nerve signal intensity on T2-weighted images in 22/22 (100%), nerve enlargement in 20/22 (91%) and contrast enhancement in 8/22 (36%). Plexus MRI enabled the expert committee's final diagnosis to be adjusted in 7/38 (18%) patients, and in conjunction with nerve conduction studies was a supportive criterion to classify 7/24 (29%) patients as definite CIDP. MRI abnormalities were more asymmetrical (P = 0.03) and less diffuse (P = 0.1) in CIDP-ND than in CIDP-D.
Our observations suggest that plexus MRI makes a valuable contribution to the diagnosis of CIDP-ND patients. Further studies are needed to investigate inter-rater reliability of clinical and imaging criteria of CIDP in these patients, and the impact on outcomes.
Keywords
Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Neural Conduction/physiology, Peripheral Nerves/diagnostic imaging, Peripheral Nerves/physiopathology, Polyradiculoneuropathy, Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating/diagnosis, Polyradiculoneuropathy, Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating/diagnostic imaging, Polyradiculoneuropathy, Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating/physiopathology, Reproducibility of Results, Retrospective Studies, CIDP diagnosis, EFNS guidelines, MR neurography, nerve hypertrophy, plexus MRI
Pubmed
Web of science
Create date
07/12/2018 17:00
Last modification date
12/08/2020 6:22
Usage data