The phenomenon of "QT stunning": the abnormal QT prolongation provoked by standing persists even as the heart rate returns to normal in patients with long QT syndrome.

Details

Serval ID
serval:BIB_38514C4B0695
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
The phenomenon of "QT stunning": the abnormal QT prolongation provoked by standing persists even as the heart rate returns to normal in patients with long QT syndrome.
Journal
Heart rhythm
Author(s)
Adler A., van der Werf C., Postema P.G., Rosso R., Bhuiyan Z.A., Kalman J.M., Vohra J.K., Guevara-Valdivia M.E., Marquez M.F., Halkin A., Benhorin J., Antzelevitch C., Wilde A.A., Viskin S.
ISSN
1556-3871 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1547-5271
Publication state
Published
Issued date
06/2012
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
9
Number
6
Pages
901-908
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Comparative Study ; Journal Article
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
Patients with long QT syndrome (LQTS) have inadequate shortening of the QT interval in response to the sudden heart rate accelerations provoked by standing-a phenomenon of diagnostic value. We now validate our original observations in a cohort twice as large. We also describe that this abnormal QT-interval response persists as the heart rate acceleration returns to baseline.
To describe a novel observation, termed "QT stunning" and to validate previous observations regarding the "QT-stretching" phenomenon in patients with LQTS by using our recently described "standing test."
The electrocardiograms of 108 patients with LQTS and 112 healthy subjects were recorded in the supine position. Subjects were then instructed to stand up quickly and remain standing for 5 minutes during continuous electrocardiographic recording. The corrected QT interval was measured at baseline (QTc(base)), when heart rate acceleration without appropriate QT-interval shortening leads to maximal QT stretching (QTc(stretch)) and upon return of heart rate to baseline (QTc(return)).
QTc(stretch) lengthened significantly more in patients with LQTS (103 ± 80 ms vs 66 ± 40 ms in controls; P <.001) and so did QTc(return) (28 ± 48 ms for patients with LQTS vs -3 ± 32 ms for controls; P <.001). Using a sensitivity cutoff of 90%, the specificity for diagnosing LQTS was 74% for QTc(base), 84% for QTc(return), and 87% for QTc(stretch).
The present study extends our previous findings on the abnormal response of the QT interval in response to standing in patients with LQTS. Our study also shows that this abnormal response persists even after the heart rate slows back to baseline.

Keywords
Adult, Electrocardiography, Exercise Test, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Heart Conduction System/physiopathology, Heart Rate/physiology, Humans, Long QT Syndrome/diagnosis, Long QT Syndrome/physiopathology, Male, Posture, ROC Curve, Recovery of Function/physiology
Pubmed
Web of science
Create date
01/03/2018 16:27
Last modification date
27/09/2021 11:15
Usage data