Comparison of Neoadjuvant Systemic Chemotherapy Protocols for the Curative-Intent Management of Peritoneal Metastases from Colorectal Cancer, Regarding Morphological Response, Pathological Response, and Long-Term Outcomes: A Retrospective Study.

Details

Serval ID
serval:BIB_383081B03F4F
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Comparison of Neoadjuvant Systemic Chemotherapy Protocols for the Curative-Intent Management of Peritoneal Metastases from Colorectal Cancer, Regarding Morphological Response, Pathological Response, and Long-Term Outcomes: A Retrospective Study.
Journal
Annals of surgical oncology
Author(s)
Fanget F., Kefleyesus A., Peron J., Bonnefoy I., Villeneuve L., Passot G., Rousset P., You B., Benzerdjeb N., Glehen O., Kepenekian V.
ISSN
1534-4681 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1068-9265
Publication state
Published
Issued date
06/2023
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
30
Number
6
Pages
3304-3315
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
Selected patients with colorectal cancer peritoneal metastases (CRPM) could be offered a curative-intent strategy based on complete cytoreductive surgery (CRS), potentially combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) and perioperative systemic chemotherapy. The impact of different neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy (NACT) regimens remains unclear due to a lack of comparative data.
Consecutive CRPM patients from a monocentric database who were treated with complete CRS after single-line NACT were included in this study. Chemotherapy regimens were tailored as a doublet drug (FOLFOX/FOLFIRI) with/without targeted therapy (anti-epidermal growth factor receptor/bevacizumab) and triplet-drug combination (FOLFIRINOX). Morphological response (MR) was assessed using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria, and pathological response (PR) was assessed using the Peritoneal Regression Grading Score (PRGS). Long-term oncologic outcomes were compared.
The cohort comprised 388 patients, including 127, 202, and 59 patients in the doublet, doublet + targeted, and triplet groups, respectively. MR rates were higher in the triplet (68.0%) and doublet + targeted groups (64.2%) when compared with the doublet group (42.4%, p = 0.003). Complete and major PRs were observed in 13.6% and 32.0% of patients, respectively. Higher MR rates were observed after doublet + targeted or triplet regimens, while no difference was observed for PR rates. In multivariate analysis, FOLFIRINOX was independently associated with better overall survival (hazard ratio 0.49, 95% confidence interval 0.25-0.96; p = 0.037). FOLFIRINOX also resulted in a higher rate of severe postoperative complications.
In this retrospective study, a FOLFIRINOX regimen as NACT seemed to result in better long-term outcomes for CRPM patients after complete CRS/HIPEC, although with higher morbidity. Prospective studies are needed, including groups without NACT and those with FOLFIRINOX + bevacizumab.
Keywords
Humans, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use, Neoadjuvant Therapy, Retrospective Studies, Bevacizumab, Peritoneal Neoplasms/drug therapy, Peritoneal Neoplasms/secondary, Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology, Pancreatic Neoplasms/drug therapy, Hyperthermia, Induced, Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures, Survival Rate, Combined Modality Therapy
Pubmed
Web of science
Create date
13/02/2023 18:18
Last modification date
14/12/2023 8:11
Usage data