2016 Consensus statement on return to sport from the First World Congress in Sports Physical Therapy, Bern.

Détails

ID Serval
serval:BIB_3790B5643F6D
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Sous-type
Synthèse (review): revue aussi complète que possible des connaissances sur un sujet, rédigée à partir de l'analyse exhaustive des travaux publiés.
Collection
Publications
Titre
2016 Consensus statement on return to sport from the First World Congress in Sports Physical Therapy, Bern.
Périodique
British Journal of Sports Medicine
Auteur(s)
Ardern C.L., Glasgow P., Schneiders A., Witvrouw E., Clarsen B., Cools A., Gojanovic B., Griffin S., Khan K.M., Moksnes H., Mutch S.A., Phillips N., Reurink G., Sadler R., Silbernagel K.G., Thorborg K., Wangensteen A., Wilk K.E., Bizzini M.
ISSN
1473-0480 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0306-3674
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
2016
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
50
Numéro
14
Pages
853-864
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal ArticlePublication Status: ppublish
Résumé
Deciding when to return to sport after injury is complex and multifactorial-an exercise in risk management. Return to sport decisions are made every day by clinicians, athletes and coaches, ideally in a collaborative way. The purpose of this consensus statement was to present and synthesise current evidence to make recommendations for return to sport decision-making, clinical practice and future research directions related to returning athletes to sport. A half day meeting was held in Bern, Switzerland, after the First World Congress in Sports Physical Therapy. 17 expert clinicians participated. 4 main sections were initially agreed upon, then participants elected to join 1 of the 4 groups-each group focused on 1 section of the consensus statement. Participants in each group discussed and summarised the key issues for their section before the 17-member group met again for discussion to reach consensus on the content of the 4 sections. Return to sport is not a decision taken in isolation at the end of the recovery and rehabilitation process. Instead, return to sport should be viewed as a continuum, paralleled with recovery and rehabilitation. Biopsychosocial models may help the clinician make sense of individual factors that may influence the athlete's return to sport, and the Strategic Assessment of Risk and Risk Tolerance framework may help decision-makers synthesise information to make an optimal return to sport decision. Research evidence to support return to sport decisions in clinical practice is scarce. Future research should focus on a standardised approach to defining, measuring and reporting return to sport outcomes, and identifying valuable prognostic factors for returning to sport.
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Oui
Création de la notice
14/06/2016 16:21
Dernière modification de la notice
20/08/2019 13:26
Données d'usage