A systematic review of interventions in the early course of bipolar disorder I or II: a report of the International Society for Bipolar Disorders Taskforce on early intervention.

Details

Ressource 1Download: 40345_2022_Article_275.pdf (1161.41 [Ko])
State: Public
Version: Final published version
License: CC BY 4.0
Serval ID
serval:BIB_3779F6B38495
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
A systematic review of interventions in the early course of bipolar disorder I or II: a report of the International Society for Bipolar Disorders Taskforce on early intervention.
Journal
International journal of bipolar disorders
Author(s)
Ratheesh A., Hett D., Ramain J., Wong E., Berk L., Conus P., Fristad M.A., Goldstein T., Hillegers M., Jauhar S., Kessing L.V., Miklowitz D.J., Murray G., Scott J., Tohen M., Yatham L.N., Young A.H., Berk M., Marwaha S.
ISSN
2194-7511 (Print)
ISSN-L
2194-7511
Publication state
Published
Issued date
03/01/2023
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
11
Number
1
Pages
1
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article ; Review
Publication Status: epublish
Abstract
Given the likelihood of progressive illness in bipolar disorder (BD), it is important to understand the benefits and risks of interventions administered early in illness course. We conducted a systematic review of the effectiveness of interventions in the early course of BD I or II.
We completed a systematic search on MEDLINE, PsycINFO, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL and Google Scholar from 1/1/1979 till 14/9/2022. We included controlled trials examining intervention effects on symptomatic, course, functional and tolerability outcomes of patients in the 'early course' of BD I or II. We classified patients to be in early course if they (a) were seeking help for the first time for a manic episode, (b) had a lifetime history of up to 3 manic episodes, or (c) had up to 6 lifetime mood episodes. Evidence quality was assessed using the GRADE approach.
From 4135 unique publications we included 25 reports representing 2212 participants in 16 randomized studies, and 17,714 participants from nine non-randomized studies. Available evidence suggested that in early illness course, lithium use was associated with lower recurrence risk compared with other mood stabilizers. Mood stabilizers were also associated with better global functioning, compared with the use of antipsychotics in the medium term. While summative findings regarding psychological therapies were limited by heterogeneity, family-focused and cognitive-behavioral interventions were associated with reduced recurrence risk or improved symptomatic outcomes. There was some evidence that the same pharmacological interventions were more efficacious in preventing recurrences when utilized in earlier rather than later illness course.
While there are promising initial findings, there is a need for more adequately powered trials to examine the efficacy and tolerability of interventions in youth and adults in early illness course. Specifically, there is a compelling need to compare the relative benefits of lithium with other pharmacological agents in preventing recurrences. In addition to symptomatic outcomes, there should be a greater focus on functional impact and tolerability. Effective pharmacological and psychological interventions should be offered to those in early course of BD, balancing potential risks using shared decision-making approaches.
Keywords
Antipsychotics, Bipolar disorder, CBT, Course, Depression, Early intervention, Lithium, Mania, Mood stabilisers, Psychoeducation, Recurrence, Remission, Systematic review
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
10/01/2023 14:09
Last modification date
26/07/2023 7:09
Usage data