Effects of concurrent endurance and strength training on running economy and .VO(2) kinetics.

Details

Serval ID
serval:BIB_37632
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Title
Effects of concurrent endurance and strength training on running economy and .VO(2) kinetics.
Journal
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
Author(s)
Millet G.P., Jaouen B., Borrani F., Candau R.
ISSN
0195-9131 (Print)
ISSN-L
0195-9131
Publication state
Published
Issued date
2002
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
34
Number
8
Pages
1351-1359
Language
english
Abstract
PURPOSE: It has been suggested that endurance training influences the running economy (CR) and the oxygen uptake (.VO(2)) kinetics in heavy exercise by accelerating the primary phase and attenuating the .VO(2) slow component. However, the effects of heavy weight training (HWT) in combination with endurance training remain unclear. The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of a concurrent HWT+endurance training on CR and the .VO(2) kinetics in endurance athletes.
METHODS: Fifteen triathletes were assigned to endurance+strength (ES) or endurance-only (E) training for 14 wk. The training program was similar, except ES performed two HWT sessions a week. Before and after the training period, the subjects performed 1) an incremental field running test for determination of .VO(2max) and the velocity associated (V(.VO2max)), the second ventilatory threshold (VT(2)); 2) a 3000-m run at constant velocity, calculated to require 25% of the difference between .VO(2max) and VT(2), to determine CR and the characteristics of the VO(2) kinetics; 3) maximal hopping tests to determine maximal mechanical power and lower-limb stiffness; 4) maximal concentric lower-limb strength measurements.
RESULTS: After the training period, maximal strength were increased (P < 0.01) in ES but remained unchanged in E. Hopping power decreased in E (P < 0.05). After training, economy (P < 0.05) and hopping power (P < 0.001) were greater in ES than in E. .VO(2max), leg hopping stiffness and the .VO(2) kinetics were not significantly affected by training either in ES or E.
CONCLUSION: Additional HWT led to improved maximal strength and running economy with no significant effects on the .VO(2) kinetics pattern in heavy exercise.
Keywords
Anaerobic Threshold/physiology, Analysis of Variance, Energy Metabolism/physiology, Female, Humans, Kinetics, Male, Oxygen Consumption/physiology, Physical Education and Training/methods, Physical Endurance/physiology, Physical Exertion/physiology, Probability, Reference Values, Running/physiology, Sensitivity and Specificity, Statistics, Nonparametric
Pubmed
Web of science
Create date
19/11/2007 11:12
Last modification date
20/08/2019 14:25
Usage data