Validation of the French Version of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System.

Details

Serval ID
serval:BIB_361B3868E362
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Validation of the French Version of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System.
Journal
Journal of pain and symptom management
Author(s)
Pautex S., Vayne-Bossert P., Bernard M., Beauverd M., Cantin B., Mazzocato C., Thollet C., Bollondi-Pauly C., Ducloux D., Herrmann F., Escher M.
ISSN
1873-6513 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0885-3924
Publication state
Published
Issued date
11/2017
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
54
Number
5
Pages
721-726.e1
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article ; Multicenter Study ; Validation Studies
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) is a brief, widely adopted, multidimensional questionnaire to evaluate patient-reported symptoms.
The objective of this study was to define a standard French version of the ESAS (F-ESAS) to determine the psychometric properties in French-speaking patients.
In a first pilot study, health professionals (n = 20) and patients (n = 33) defined the most adapted terms in French (F-ESAS). In a prospective multicentric study, palliative care patients completed the three forms of F-ESAS (F-ESAS-VI, F-ESAS-VE, and F-ESAS-NU, where VI is visual, VE, verbal, and NU, numerical), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. All patients had a test-retest evaluation during the same half-day. Standardized distraction material was used between each scale.
One hundred twenty-four patients were included (mean age [±SD]: 68.3 ± 12; 70 women; 54 men). Test-retest reliability was high for all three F-ESAS, and the correlation between these scales was nearly perfect (Spearman rs = 0.66-0.91; P < 0.05). F-ESAS-VI, F-ESAS-VE, and F-ESAS-NU performed similarly and were equally reliable, although there was a trend toward lower reliability for F-ESAS-VI. Correlation between F-ESAS depression and anxiety and HADS depression and anxiety, respectively, were positive (Spearman rs = 0.38-0.41 for depression; Spearman rs = 0.48-0.57 for anxiety, P < 0.05). Among patients, 59 (48%), 45 (36%), and 20 (16%) preferred to assess their symptoms with F-ESAS-VE, F-ESAS-NU, and F-ESAS-VI, respectively.
The F-ESAS is a valid and reliable tool for measuring multidimensional symptoms in French-speaking patients with an advanced cancer. All forms of F-ESAS performed well with a trend for better psychometric performance for F-ESAS-NU, but patients preferred the F-ESAS-VE.
Keywords
Aged, Female, Health Personnel, Humans, Male, Neoplasms/diagnosis, Neoplasms/physiopathology, Neoplasms/psychology, Palliative Care/methods, Pilot Projects, Prospective Studies, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Reproducibility of Results, Surveys and Questionnaires, Symptom Assessment, Translating, ESAS, French, Symptom, assessment, palliative care, reliability, validity
Pubmed
Web of science
Create date
14/08/2017 8:38
Last modification date
04/03/2020 6:19
Usage data