Immune-modulating antibodies in head and neck cancer: past, present, and future
Details
Request a copy Under indefinite embargo.
UNIL restricted access
State: Public
Version: Final published version
License: Not specified
UNIL restricted access
State: Public
Version: Final published version
License: Not specified
Serval ID
serval:BIB_35E051ACC9B2
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Publication sub-type
Review (review): journal as complete as possible of one specific subject, written based on exhaustive analyses from published work.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Immune-modulating antibodies in head and neck cancer: past, present, and future
Journal
Belgian Journal of Medical Oncology
ISSN
1784-7141
Publication state
Published
Issued date
01/12/2018
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
12
Pages
3-14
Language
english
Abstract
Squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) has recently expanded the growing range of oncologic diseases successfully treated with immune-modulating agents. With the origins dating back to the nineteenth century, the concept of immunotherapy was repeatedly revisited and refined but also rejected and criticized. Currently, its armamentarium comprises tumour-specific antibodies, cancer vaccines, cytokines, adoptive T-cell transfer, and immune-modulating antibodies. Among these approaches it has been the latter one drawing major attention from healthcare professionals. Nivolumab and pembrolizumab are monoclonal immunoglobulins directed against programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1), an immune-checkpoint negatively regulating T-cells. In second-line recurrent and/or metastatic SCCHN, two phase III studies demonstrated meaningful clinical benefit achieved by these drugs, dubbed checkpoint inhibitors, compared with standard monotherapy (methotrexate, docetaxel, or cetuximab). In the CheckMate-141 trial, nivolumab significantly improved median overall survival (OS) from 5.1 to 7.5 months. A similar benefit achieved by pembrolizumab in KEYNOTE-040 fell short of statistical significance (8.4 vs. 6.9 months), probably due to post-study immune-checkpoint therapy leading to a better-than-expected survival in the control arm. However, the classical outcome measures do not fully capture the exceptional activity of these agents. Apart from low frequency of severe adverse events (13% vs. 35% with standard therapy), these antibodies can induce durable tumour responses and retain activity even after several previous chemotherapy lines. With their advent in first-line palliative regimens and protocols for locally advanced disease, further progress is expected.Reliable predictive biomarkers are urgently needed, and several candidates are being evaluated. Among them, tumour mutational burden and gut microbiota offer an innovative approach to biomarker-enrichment strategy.
Keywords
Head and neck cancer, targeted therapy, immunotherapy, nivolumab, pembrolizumab, biomarkers, adverse events
Create date
06/12/2020 11:55
Last modification date
07/12/2020 6:26