Stent sizing by coronary CT angiography compared with optical coherence tomography.
Details
Serval ID
serval:BIB_306A47CFC582
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Stent sizing by coronary CT angiography compared with optical coherence tomography.
Journal
Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography
ISSN
1876-861X (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1876-861X
Publication state
Published
Issued date
2024
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
18
Number
4
Pages
337-344
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article ; Comparative Study ; Multicenter Study
Publication Status: ppublish
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
Coronary CT angiography (CCTA) is well-established for diagnosis and stratification of coronary artery disease (CAD). Its usefulness in guiding percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) and stent sizing is unknown.
This is a sub-analysis of the Precise Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Plan (P3) study (NCT03782688). We analyzed 65 vessels with matched CCTA and pre-PCI optical coherence tomography (OCT) assessment. The CCTA-guided stent size was defined by the mean distal reference lumen diameter rounded up to the nearest stent diameter. The OCT lumen-guided stent size was the mean distal reference lumen diameter rounded to the closest stent diameter. The agreement on stent diameters was determined with Kappa statistics, Passing-Bablok regression analysis, and the Bland-Altman method.
The distal reference lumen diameter by CCTA and OCT were 2.75 ± 0.53 mm and 2.72 ± 0.55 mm (mean difference 0.06, limits of agreement -0.7 to 0.82). There were no proportional or systematic differences (coefficient A 1.06, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.3 and coefficient B -0.22, 95% CI -0.83 to 0.36) between methods. The agreement between the CCTA and OCT stent size was substantial (Cohen's weighted Kappa 0.74, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.85). Compared to OCT stent diameter, CCTA stent size was concordant in 52.3% of the cases; CCTA overestimated stent size in 20.0% and underestimated in 27.7%.
CCTA accurately assessed the reference vessel diameter used for stent sizing. CCTA-based stent sizing showed a substantial agreement with OCT. CCTA allows for PCI planning and may aid in selecting stent diameter.
This is a sub-analysis of the Precise Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Plan (P3) study (NCT03782688). We analyzed 65 vessels with matched CCTA and pre-PCI optical coherence tomography (OCT) assessment. The CCTA-guided stent size was defined by the mean distal reference lumen diameter rounded up to the nearest stent diameter. The OCT lumen-guided stent size was the mean distal reference lumen diameter rounded to the closest stent diameter. The agreement on stent diameters was determined with Kappa statistics, Passing-Bablok regression analysis, and the Bland-Altman method.
The distal reference lumen diameter by CCTA and OCT were 2.75 ± 0.53 mm and 2.72 ± 0.55 mm (mean difference 0.06, limits of agreement -0.7 to 0.82). There were no proportional or systematic differences (coefficient A 1.06, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.3 and coefficient B -0.22, 95% CI -0.83 to 0.36) between methods. The agreement between the CCTA and OCT stent size was substantial (Cohen's weighted Kappa 0.74, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.85). Compared to OCT stent diameter, CCTA stent size was concordant in 52.3% of the cases; CCTA overestimated stent size in 20.0% and underestimated in 27.7%.
CCTA accurately assessed the reference vessel diameter used for stent sizing. CCTA-based stent sizing showed a substantial agreement with OCT. CCTA allows for PCI planning and may aid in selecting stent diameter.
Keywords
Humans, Tomography, Optical Coherence, Coronary Angiography, Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging, Coronary Artery Disease/therapy, Computed Tomography Angiography, Predictive Value of Tests, Coronary Vessels/diagnostic imaging, Stents, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/instrumentation, Male, Female, Reproducibility of Results, Middle Aged, Aged, Prosthesis Design, Coronary computed tomography angiography, Optical coherence tomography, Percutaneous coronary intervention
Pubmed
Web of science
Create date
14/06/2024 14:58
Last modification date
02/11/2024 7:10