Stent sizing by coronary CT angiography compared with optical coherence tomography.

Details

Serval ID
serval:BIB_306A47CFC582
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Stent sizing by coronary CT angiography compared with optical coherence tomography.
Journal
Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography
Author(s)
Ko B., Ohashi H., Mizukami T., Sakai K., Sonck J., Nørgaard B.L., Maeng M., Jensen J.M., Ihdayhid A., Tajima A., Ando H., Amano T., De Bruyne B., Koo B.K., Otake H., Collet C.
ISSN
1876-861X (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1876-861X
Publication state
Published
Issued date
2024
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
18
Number
4
Pages
337-344
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article ; Comparative Study ; Multicenter Study
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
Coronary CT angiography (CCTA) is well-established for diagnosis and stratification of coronary artery disease (CAD). Its usefulness in guiding percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) and stent sizing is unknown.
This is a sub-analysis of the Precise Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Plan (P3) study (NCT03782688). We analyzed 65 vessels with matched CCTA and pre-PCI optical coherence tomography (OCT) assessment. The CCTA-guided stent size was defined by the mean distal reference lumen diameter rounded up to the nearest stent diameter. The OCT lumen-guided stent size was the mean distal reference lumen diameter rounded to the closest stent diameter. The agreement on stent diameters was determined with Kappa statistics, Passing-Bablok regression analysis, and the Bland-Altman method.
The distal reference lumen diameter by CCTA and OCT were 2.75 ​± ​0.53 ​mm and 2.72 ​± ​0.55 ​mm (mean difference 0.06, limits of agreement -0.7 to 0.82). There were no proportional or systematic differences (coefficient A 1.06, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.3 and coefficient B -0.22, 95% CI -0.83 to 0.36) between methods. The agreement between the CCTA and OCT stent size was substantial (Cohen's weighted Kappa 0.74, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.85). Compared to OCT stent diameter, CCTA stent size was concordant in 52.3% of the cases; CCTA overestimated stent size in 20.0% and underestimated in 27.7%.
CCTA accurately assessed the reference vessel diameter used for stent sizing. CCTA-based stent sizing showed a substantial agreement with OCT. CCTA allows for PCI planning and may aid in selecting stent diameter.
Keywords
Humans, Tomography, Optical Coherence, Coronary Angiography, Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging, Coronary Artery Disease/therapy, Computed Tomography Angiography, Predictive Value of Tests, Coronary Vessels/diagnostic imaging, Stents, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/instrumentation, Male, Female, Reproducibility of Results, Middle Aged, Aged, Prosthesis Design, Coronary computed tomography angiography, Optical coherence tomography, Percutaneous coronary intervention
Pubmed
Web of science
Create date
14/06/2024 14:58
Last modification date
02/11/2024 7:10
Usage data