Health care workers' influenza vaccination: motivations and mandatory mask policy

Détails

Ressource 1Télécharger: serval:BIB_2D9EF712787D.P001 (514.34 [Ko])
Etat: Public
Version: de l'auteur
Licence: Non spécifiée
It was possible to publish this article open access thanks to a Swiss National Licence with the publisher.
ID Serval
serval:BIB_2D9EF712787D
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Titre
Health care workers' influenza vaccination: motivations and mandatory mask policy
Périodique
Occupational Medicine (oxford, England)
Auteur(s)
Dorribo Victor, Lazor-Blanchet Catherine, Hugli Olivier, Zanetti Giorgio
ISSN
1471-8405 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0962-7480
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
2015
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
65
Numéro
9
Pages
739-745
Langue
anglais
Résumé
BACKGROUND: Vaccination of health care workers (HCW) against seasonal influenza (SI) is recommended but vaccination rate rarely reach >30%. Vaccination coverage against 2009 pandemic influenza (PI) was 52% in our hospital, whilst a new policy requiring unvaccinated HCW to wear a mask during patient care duties was enforced.
AIMS: To investigate the determinants of this higher vaccination acceptance for PI and to look for an association with the new mask-wearing policy.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study, involving HCW of three critical departments of a 1023-bed, tertiary-care university hospital in Switzerland. Self-reported 2009-10 SI and 2009 PI vaccination statuses, reasons and demographic data were collected through a literature-based questionnaire. Descriptive statistics, uni- and multivariate analyses were then performed.
RESULTS: There were 472 respondents with a response rate of 54%. Self-reported vaccination acceptance was 64% for PI and 53% for SI. PI vaccination acceptance was associated with being vaccinated against SI (OR 9.5; 95% CI 5.5-16.4), being a physician (OR 7.7; 95% CI 3.1-19.1) and feeling uncomfortable wearing a mask (OR 1.7; 95% CI 1.0-2.8). Main motives for refusing vaccination were: preference for wearing a surgical mask (80% for PI, not applicable for SI) and concerns about vaccine safety (64%, 50%) and efficacy (44%, 35%).
CONCLUSIONS: The new mask-wearing policy was a motivation for vaccination but also offered an alternative to non-compliant HCW. Concerns about vaccine safety and efficiency and self-interest of health care workers are still main determinants for influenza vaccination acceptance. Better incentives are needed to encourage vaccination amongst non-physician HCW.
Mots-clé
Occupational Health , Workplace , Influenza Vaccines , Policy , Risk Management , Vaccination , Health Promotion
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Oui
Création de la notice
20/08/2015 16:37
Dernière modification de la notice
25/09/2019 7:08
Données d'usage