Registry on the Treatment of Central and Complex Sleep-Disordered Breathing with Adaptive Servo-Ventilation (READ-ASV): protocol and cohort profile.

Details

Serval ID
serval:BIB_2AAB57DD5357
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Registry on the Treatment of Central and Complex Sleep-Disordered Breathing with Adaptive Servo-Ventilation (READ-ASV): protocol and cohort profile.
Journal
ERJ open research
Author(s)
Arzt M., Munt O., Pépin J.L., Heinzer R., Kübeck R., von Hehn U., Ehrsam-Tosi D., Benjafield A., Woehrle H.
ISSN
2312-0541 (Print)
ISSN-L
2312-0541
Publication state
Published
Issued date
03/2023
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
9
Number
2
Pages
00618-2022
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: epublish
Abstract
Although adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV) effectively supresses central sleep apnoea (CSA), little is known about real-world indications of ASV therapy and its effects on quality of life (QoL).
This report details the design, baseline characteristics, indications for ASV and symptom burden in patients enrolled in the Registry on the Treatment of Central and Complex Sleep-Disordered Breathing with Adaptive Servo-Ventilation (READ-ASV). This multicentre, European, non-interventional trial enrolled participants prescribed ASV in clinical practice between September 2017 and March 2021. An expert review board assigned participants to ASV indications using a guideline-based semi-automated algorithm. The primary end-point was change in disease-specific QoL based on the Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ) from baseline to 12-month follow-up.
The registry population includes 801 participants (age 67±12 years, 14% female). Indications for ASV were treatment-emergent or persistent CSA (56%), CSA in cardiovascular disease (31%), unclassified CSA (2%), coexisting obstructive sleep apnoea and CSA (4%), obstructive sleep apnoea (3%), CSA in stroke (2%) and opioid-induced CSA (1%). Baseline mean apnoea--hypopnoea index was 48±23 events·h <sup>-1</sup> (≥30 events·h <sup>-1</sup> in 78%), FOSQ score was 16.7±3.0 (<17.9 in 54%) and Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) score was 8.8±4.9 (>10 in 34%); 62% of patients were symptomatic (FOSQ score <17.9 or ESS score >10).
The most common indications for ASV were treatment-emergent or persistent CSA or CSA in cardiovascular disease (excluding systolic heart failure). Patients using ASV in clinical practice had severe sleep-disordered breathing and were often symptomatic. One-year follow-up will provide data on the effects of ASV on QoL, respiratory parameters and clinical outcomes in these patients.
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
01/05/2023 11:04
Last modification date
16/11/2023 8:11
Usage data