Reporting studies on time to diagnosis: proposal of a guideline by an international panel (REST).

Détails

Ressource 1Télécharger: BIB_2A95560D6242.pdf (1055.09 [Ko])
Etat: Serval
Version: Final published version
ID Serval
serval:BIB_2A95560D6242
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Sous-type
Editorial
Collection
Publications
Titre
Reporting studies on time to diagnosis: proposal of a guideline by an international panel (REST).
Périodique
BMC medicine
Auteur(s)
Launay E., Cohen J.F., Bossuyt P.M., Buekens P., Deeks J., Dye T., Feltbower R., Ferrari A., Kramer M., Leeflang M., Moher D., Moons K.G., von Elm E., Ravaud P., Chalumeau M.
ISSN
1741-7015 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1741-7015
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
27/09/2016
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
14
Numéro
1
Pages
146
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: AL
Publication Status: epublish
Publication types: Editorial

Résumé
Studies on time to diagnosis are an increasing field of clinical research that may help to plan corrective actions and identify inequities in access to healthcare. Specific features of time to diagnosis studies, such as how participants were selected and how time to diagnosis was defined and measured, are poorly reported. The present study aims to derive a reporting guideline for studies on time to diagnosis.
Each item of a list previously used to evaluate the completeness of reporting of studies on time to diagnosis was independently evaluated by a core panel of international experts (n = 11) for relevance and readability before an open electronic discussion allowed consensus to be reached on a refined list. The list was then submitted with an explanatory document to first, last and/or corresponding authors (n = 98) of published systematic reviews on time to diagnosis (n = 45) for relevance and readability, and finally approved by the core expert panel.
The refined reporting guideline consists of a 19-item checklist: six items are about the process of participant selection (with a suggested flowchart), six about the definition and measurement of time to diagnosis, and three about optional analyses of associations between time to diagnosis and participant characteristics and health outcomes. Of 24 responding authors of systematic reviews, more than 21 (≥88 %) rated the items as relevant, and more than 17 (≥70 %) as readable; 19 of 22 (86 %) authors stated that they would potentially use the reporting guideline in the future.
We propose a reporting guideline (REST) that could help authors, reviewers, and editors of time to diagnosis study reports to improve the completeness and the accuracy of their reporting.

Pubmed
Open Access
Oui
Création de la notice
11/10/2016 19:03
Dernière modification de la notice
08/05/2019 16:17
Données d'usage