Mass cytometry and full spectrum flow cytometry have recently emerged as new promising single cell proteomic analysis tools that can be exploited to decipher the extensive diversity of immune cell repertoires and their implication in human diseases. In this study, we evaluated the performance of mass cytometry against full spectrum flow cytometry using an identical 33-color antibody panel on four healthy individuals. Our data revealed an overall high concordance in the quantification of major immune cell populations between the two platforms using a semi-automated clustering approach. We further showed a strong correlation of cluster assignment when comparing manual and automated clustering. Both comparisons revealed minor disagreements in the quantification and assignment of rare cell subpopulations. Our study showed that both single cell proteomic technologies generate highly overlapping results and substantiate that the choice of technology is not a primary factor for successful biological assessment of cell profiles but must be considered in a broader design framework of clinical studies.