Perspectives of paediatric hospital staff on factors influencing the sustainability and spread of a safety quality improvement programme

Details

Serval ID
serval:BIB_25E6EE1B52C8
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Title
Perspectives of paediatric hospital staff on factors influencing the sustainability and spread of a safety quality improvement programme
Journal
BMJ Open
Author(s)
Lachman P., Gondek D., Edbrooke-Childs J., Deighton J., Stapley E.
ISSN
2044-6055 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
2044-6055
Publication state
Published
Issued date
2021
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
11
Number
3
Pages
e042163
Language
english
Notes
Lachman, Peter
Gondek, Dawid
Edbrooke-Childs, Julian
Deighton, Jessica
Stapley, Emily
eng
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
England
BMJ Open. 2021 Mar 22;11(3):e042163. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042163.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Situation Awareness For Everyone (SAFE) is a quality improvement programme aiming to improve situation awareness in paediatric clinical teams. The aim of our study was to examine hospital staff perceptions of the facilitators and barriers/challenges to the sustaining and subsequent spread of the huddle, the key intervention of the SAFE programme. SETTING: Interviews were held on two wards in two children hospitals and on two children wards in two district general hospitals. METHOD: Semistructured interviews were conducted with 23 staff members from four National Health Service paediatric wards. A deductive thematic analysis was conducted, drawing on an existing framework, which groups the factors influencing programme sustainability into four categories: innovation, leadership, process and context. PARTICIPANTS: 23 staff in two children's hospitals and two children's wards across four UK hospitals, comprising of nurses and doctors, administration or housekeeping staff, ward managers and matrons, and allied professionals. PRIMARY OUTCOMES: Understanding factors contributing to the sustaining and spread of a quality improvement intervention. RESULTS: Perceptions of the benefits, purpose and fit of the huddle, team commitment, sharing learning, adaptation of the method and senior leadership were identified as facilitators. High staff turnover, large multiple specialty medical staff teams, lack of senior leadership and dislike of change were identified as barriers/challenges. CONCLUSIONS: Sustaining and spreading quality improvement interventions in a complex clinical setting requires understanding of the interplay between the actual innovation and existing leadership, process and contextual factors. These must be considered at the planning stage of an innovation to maximise the potential for sustainability and spread to other settings.
Keywords
*Hospitals, Pediatric, Humans, Leadership, Personnel, Hospital, Qualitative Research, *Quality Improvement, State Medicine, *health & safety, *paediatrics, *qualitative research, involved in the data collection and analysis. ES, as senior author, oversaw the, data collection and data analysis and approved the final version of the paper.
Pubmed
Create date
28/09/2023 7:29
Last modification date
10/10/2023 9:37
Usage data