Does Case Management Provide Support for Staff Facing Frequent Users of Emergency Departments? A Comparative Mixed-Method Evaluation of ED Staff Perception.

Details

Ressource 1Download: 34348645_BIB_2317ACB41905.pdf (545.30 [Ko])
State: Public
Version: Final published version
License: CC BY 4.0
Serval ID
serval:BIB_2317ACB41905
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Does Case Management Provide Support for Staff Facing Frequent Users of Emergency Departments? A Comparative Mixed-Method Evaluation of ED Staff Perception.
Journal
BMC emergency medicine
Author(s)
von Allmen M., Grazioli V.S., Kasztura M., Chastonay O., Moullin J.C., Hugli O., Daeppen J.B., Bodenmann P.
ISSN
1471-227X (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1471-227X
Publication state
Published
Issued date
04/08/2021
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
21
Number
1
Pages
92
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: epublish
Abstract
Frequent users of emergency departments (FUED) account for a disproportionate number of emergency department (ED) visits and contribute to a wide range of challenges for ED staff. While several research has documented that case management (CM) tailored to FUED leads to a reduction in ED visits and a better quality of life (QoL) among FUED, whether there is added value for ED staff remains to be explored. This study aimed to compare, among staff in two academic EDs in Switzerland (one with and one without CM), the FUED-related knowledge, perceptions of the extent of the FUED issue, FUED-related work challenges and FUEDs' legitimacy to use ED.
Mixed methods were employed. First, ED physicians and nurses (N = 253) of the two EDs completed an online survey assessing their knowledge and perceptions of FUEDs. Results between healthcare providers working in an ED with CM to those working in an ED without CM were compared using independent two-sided T-tests. Next, a sample of participants (n = 16) took part in a qualitative assessment via one-to-one interviews (n = 6) or focus groups (n = 10).
Both quantitative and qualitative results documented that the FUED-related knowledge, the extent FUED were perceived as an issue and perceived FUEDs' legitimacy to use ED were not different between groups. The level of perceived FUED-related challenges was also similar between groups. Quantitative results showed that nurses with CM experienced more challenges related to FUED. Qualitative exploration revealed that lack of psychiatric staff within the emergency team and lack of communication between ED staff and CM team were some of the explanations behind these counterintuitive findings.
Despite promising results on FUEDs' QoL and frequency of ED visits, these preliminary findings suggest that CM may provide limited support to ED staff in its current form. Given the high burden of FUED-related challenges encountered by ED staff, improved communication and FUED-related knowledge transfer between ED staff and the CM team should be prioritized to increase the value of a FUED CM intervention for ED staff.
Keywords
Case management, Emergency service, Frequent users of emergency departments, Staff
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
20/07/2021 13:56
Last modification date
12/01/2022 8:08
Usage data