Sorafenib with or without everolimus in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): a randomized multicenter, multinational phase II trial (SAKK 77/08 and SASL 29).

Details

Serval ID
serval:BIB_22900D1DA607
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Sorafenib with or without everolimus in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): a randomized multicenter, multinational phase II trial (SAKK 77/08 and SASL 29).
Journal
Annals of oncology
Author(s)
Koeberle D., Dufour J.F., Demeter G., Li Q., Ribi K., Samaras P., Saletti P., Roth A.D., Horber D., Buehlmann M., Wagner A.D., Montemurro M., Lakatos G., Feilchenfeldt J., Peck-Radosavljevic M., Rauch D., Tschanz B., Bodoky G.
Working group(s)
Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK)
ISSN
1569-8041 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0923-7534
Publication state
Published
Issued date
05/2016
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
27
Number
5
Pages
856-861
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Clinical Trial, Phase II ; Journal Article ; Randomized Controlled Trial
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
Sorafenib (S), a multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is the standard of care for first-line systemic treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Everolimus (E) is a potent inhibitor of mTOR, a pathway frequently activated in HCC. Preclinical data suggest that the combination S + E has additive effects compared with single-agent S.
Patients with unresectable or metastatic HCC and Child-Pugh ≤7 liver dysfunction were randomized to receive daily S 800 mg alone or with E 5 mg until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was progression-free survival at 12 weeks (PFS12). The secondary end points included response rate, PFS, time to progression (TTP), overall survival (OS), duration of disease stabilization (DDS), safety, and quality-of-life (QoL) assessments.
A total of 106 patients were randomized: 46 patients received S and 60 patients received S + E. Ninety-three patients were assessable for the primary end point and 105 patients for the safety analysis. The PFS12 rate was 70% [95% confidence interval (CI) 54-83] and 68% (95% CI 53-81) in patients randomized to S and S + E, respectively. The RECIST (mRECIST) response rate was 0% (23%) in the S arm and 10% (35%) in the S + E arm. Median PFS (6.6 versus 5.7 months), TTP (7.6 versus 6.3 months), DDS (6.7 versus 6.7 months), and OS (10 versus 12 months) were similar in the S and S + E arms, respectively. Grade 3/4 adverse events occurred in 72% and 86% of patients in arm S and arm S + E, respectively. Patients had similar QoL scores over time, except for a greater worsening in physical well-being and mood in the arm S + E.
No evidence was found that S + E improves the efficacy compared with S alone. Combining 5 mg E with full-dose S is feasible, but more toxic than S alone. Further testing of this drug combination in molecularly unselected HCCs appears unwarranted.
NCT01005199.

Keywords
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage, Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/drug therapy, Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/pathology, Disease-Free Survival, Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/classification, Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/pathology, Everolimus/administration & dosage, Female, Humans, Liver Neoplasms/drug therapy, Liver Neoplasms/pathology, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Staging, Niacinamide/administration & dosage, Niacinamide/analogs & derivatives, Phenylurea Compounds/administration & dosage, everolimus, hepatocellular carcinoma, sorafenib, tyrosine kinase inhibitor
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
20/02/2016 17:24
Last modification date
20/08/2019 14:00
Usage data