Management of Endometrial Cancer: French Society of Onco-Gynecology's Evaluation through a Delphi Survey.

Details

Ressource 1Download: 36431242_BIB_21B6154B2317.pdf (460.11 [Ko])
State: Public
Version: Final published version
License: CC BY 4.0
Serval ID
serval:BIB_21B6154B2317
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Management of Endometrial Cancer: French Society of Onco-Gynecology's Evaluation through a Delphi Survey.
Journal
Journal of clinical medicine
Author(s)
Marti C., Deluche E., Jochum F., Bendifallah S., Azais H., Deidier J., Cockenpot V., Menoux I., Balaya V., Betrian S., Chargari C., Gouy S., Genestie C., Feki A., Uzan C., Guyon F., Devouassoux-Shisheboran M., Body N., Akladios C., Mathevet P., Guani B.
Working group(s)
On Behalf Of The Sfog And The Sfog Campus
ISSN
2077-0383 (Print)
ISSN-L
2077-0383
Publication state
Published
Issued date
15/11/2022
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
11
Number
22
Pages
6765
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: epublish
Abstract
Our aim was to assess the opinion of a panel of experts and obtain a consensus on the management of endometrial cancer in France and French Switzerland. A Delphi survey was carried out among a panel of French and French-speaking Swiss experts. The first questionnaire included 65 questions divided into eight categories: characterization of experts, histo-molecular characteristics and radiological data of endometrial cancer, and management of low-risk, intermediate-risk, intermediate-high-risk, high-risk, and metastatic cancers. The experts were asked to reply on a 9-point scale, both on the validity and the clarity of each question. After the answers were analyzed, a second questionnaire was sent to the same experts. The study took place between December 2021 and March 2022. Further, 58 (57.4%) of the 101 experts responded in the first round, and 39 recommendations were obtained (60%). Six questions were voted redundant and 20 discordant. These questions were reformulated, and, at the end of the second round, 17 recommendations were validated (85%). In total, the study presents an analysis of 56 questions and related responses. Expert advice helps to clarify non-consensual issues, standardize the management of endometrial cancer, and optimize clinical practices.
Keywords
Delphi procedure, SFOG guidelines, endometrial cancer, endometrial cancer guidelines
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
05/12/2022 16:37
Last modification date
23/01/2024 8:21
Usage data