L'emploi d'aerosols de ribavirine lors d'infection a virus respiratoire syncytial est-il justifie? Evaluation clinique et economique. [Is the use of ribavirin aerosols in respiratory syncytial virus infections justified? Clinical and economic evaluation]

Details

Serval ID
serval:BIB_1F3195B413A5
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
L'emploi d'aerosols de ribavirine lors d'infection a virus respiratoire syncytial est-il justifie? Evaluation clinique et economique. [Is the use of ribavirin aerosols in respiratory syncytial virus infections justified? Clinical and economic evaluation]
Journal
Archives de Pediatrie
Author(s)
Ventura  F., Cheseaux  J. J., Cotting  J., Guignard  J. P.
ISSN
0929-693X (Print)
Publication state
Published
Issued date
02/1998
Volume
5
Number
2
Pages
123-31
Notes
Clinical Trial
Comparative Study
Controlled Clinical Trial
English Abstract
Journal Article
Multicenter Study --- Old month value: Feb
Abstract
The controversy about the use of ribavirin aerosol for children at risk (cardiopathy, pneumopathy, premature and immunodeficient patients), in case of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection, led us to stop its prescription in 1993 and study prospectively the patients admitted during the following winters. METHODS: Criterias of inclusion for this study were those of the Committee on Infectious Diseases of the American Academy of Pediatrics concerning the use of ribavirin aerosol. Two cohorts of patients were studied: the first group included treated patients (ribavirin group: n = 22, ribavirin and support treatment: salbutamol aerosols, respiratory physiotherapy and oxygen-therapy; winters 1989-1990 to 1992-1993); the second group included patients with support treatment only (control group: n = 22; winters 1993-1994 and 1994-1995). RESULTS: The clinical gravity score at admission (4.55 vs 5.23, P = 0.46) and the risk factor scores (3.05 vs 3.27, P = 0.69) of the two groups were identical. Results showed that the children of the ribavirin group stayed much longer in hospital (14.2 vs 8.2 days, P = 0.002) and in the intensive care unit (7.2 vs 0.2 days, P < 0.001) than those of the control group. More support treatment was necessary for the ribavirin group as regard respiratory physiotherapy (3.8 vs 2.7 sessions a day, P = 0.026), the duration of oxygen-therapy (7.3 vs 3.7 days, P = 0.030) and the number of children requiring respiratory assistance (4 vs 0 children, P = 0.116). Administration of ribavirin aerosols (480 US$ a dose) and the way in which such treatment was carried out meant high daily costs for the ribavirin group (1,076 vs 604 US$, P < 0.001). As hospitalization was longer for children treated with ribavirin, the global cost was therefore much higher (15,552 vs 5,156 US$, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The antiviral effect of ribavirin is undeniable. However ribavirin is known to be the cause of severe bronchospasms (two cases in our study) and can also cause moderate and long term bronchospasms, aggravating therefore the clinical evolution of the disease. Our experience shows that administration of ribavirin aerosols in case of RSV infection of inferior respiratory airways seems not to be justified.
Keywords
Aerosols Albuterol/therapeutic use Antiviral Agents/administration & dosage/economics/*therapeutic use Cohort Studies Costs and Cost Analysis Female France Humans Infant Infant, Newborn Infant, Premature Male Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections/*drug therapy/economics/prevention & control Respiratory Therapy Ribavirin/adverse effects/economics/*therapeutic use Risk Factors
Pubmed
Web of science
Create date
25/01/2008 11:04
Last modification date
20/08/2019 13:55
Usage data