The challenges of clinical trials in fragile X syndrome
Details
Download: BIB_1D79C9FAA05E.P001.pdf (403.34 [Ko])
State: Public
Version: Final published version
State: Public
Version: Final published version
Serval ID
serval:BIB_1D79C9FAA05E
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Publication sub-type
Review (review): journal as complete as possible of one specific subject, written based on exhaustive analyses from published work.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
The challenges of clinical trials in fragile X syndrome
Journal
Psychopharmacology
ISSN
0033-3158 (Print)
1432-2072 (Electronic)
1432-2072 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0033-3158
Publication state
Published
Issued date
2013
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
231
Number
6
Pages
1237-1250
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Review ; review-article Identifiant PubMed Central: PMC3932172
Abstract
RATIONALE: Advances in understanding the underlying mechanisms of conditions such as fragile X syndrome (FXS) and autism spectrum disorders have revealed heterogeneous populations. Recent trials of novel FXS therapies have highlighted several challenges including subpopulations with possibly differential therapeutic responses, the lack of specific outcome measures capturing the full range of improvements of patients with FXS, and a lack of biomarkers that can track whether a specific mechanism is responsive to a new drug and whether the response correlates with clinical improvement.
OBJECTIVES: We review the phenotypic heterogeneity of FXS and the implications for clinical research in FXS and other neurodevelopmental disorders.
RESULTS: Residual levels of fragile X mental retardation protein (FMRP) expression explain in part the heterogeneity in the FXS phenotype; studies indicate a correlation with both cognitive and behavioral deficits. However, this does not fully explain the extent of phenotypic variance observed or the variability of drug response. Post hoc analyses of studies involving the selective mGluR5 antagonist mavoglurant and the GABAB agonist arbaclofen have uncovered significant therapeutic responses following patient stratification according to FMR1 promoter methylation patterns or baseline severity of social withdrawal, respectively. Future studies designed to quantify disease modification will need to develop new strategies to track changes effectively over time and in multiple symptom domains.
CONCLUSION: Appropriate selection of patients and outcome measures is central to optimizing future clinical investigations of these complex disorders.
OBJECTIVES: We review the phenotypic heterogeneity of FXS and the implications for clinical research in FXS and other neurodevelopmental disorders.
RESULTS: Residual levels of fragile X mental retardation protein (FMRP) expression explain in part the heterogeneity in the FXS phenotype; studies indicate a correlation with both cognitive and behavioral deficits. However, this does not fully explain the extent of phenotypic variance observed or the variability of drug response. Post hoc analyses of studies involving the selective mGluR5 antagonist mavoglurant and the GABAB agonist arbaclofen have uncovered significant therapeutic responses following patient stratification according to FMR1 promoter methylation patterns or baseline severity of social withdrawal, respectively. Future studies designed to quantify disease modification will need to develop new strategies to track changes effectively over time and in multiple symptom domains.
CONCLUSION: Appropriate selection of patients and outcome measures is central to optimizing future clinical investigations of these complex disorders.
Keywords
Child Development Disorders, Pervasive/drug therapy, Child Development Disorders, Pervasive/physiopathology, Clinical Trials as Topic/methods, Fragile X Syndrome/diagnosis, Fragile X Syndrome/drug therapy, Fragile X Syndrome/genetics, Fragile X Syndrome/physiopathology
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
11/07/2016 10:04
Last modification date
20/08/2019 12:53