Pain management after elective craniotomy: a systematic review with procedure-specific postoperative pain management (PROSPECT) recommendations.

Details

Ressource 1Download: 37417808.pdf (769.81 [Ko])
State: Public
Version: Final published version
License: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
Serval ID
serval:BIB_1BFA2555C77C
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Pain management after elective craniotomy: a systematic review with procedure-specific postoperative pain management (PROSPECT) recommendations.
Journal
European journal of anaesthesiology
Author(s)
Mestdagh F.P., Lavand'homme P.M., Pirard G., Joshi G.P., Sauter A.R., Van de Velde M.
Working group(s)
PROSPECT Working Group∗ of the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy (ESRA)
Contributor(s)
Joshi G.P., Pogatzki-Zahn E., Van de Velde M., Bonnet M.P., Kehlet H., Bonnet F., Rawal N., Delbos A., Lavandhomme P., Beloeil H., Raeder J., Sauter A., Albrecht E., Lirk P., Freys S., Lobo D.
ISSN
1365-2346 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0265-0215
Publication state
Published
Issued date
01/10/2023
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
40
Number
10
Pages
747-757
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Systematic Review ; Journal Article
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
Pain after craniotomy can be intense and its management is often suboptimal.
We aimed to evaluate the available literature and develop recommendations for optimal pain management after craniotomy.
A systematic review using procedure-specific postoperative pain management (PROSPECT) methodology was undertaken.
Randomised controlled trials and systematic reviews published in English from 1 January 2010 to 30 June 2021 assessing pain after craniotomy using analgesic, anaesthetic or surgical interventions were identified from MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Databases.
Each randomised controlled trial (RCT) and systematic review was critically evaluated and included only if met the PROSPECT requirements. Included studies were evaluated for clinically relevant differences in pain scores, use of nonopioid analgesics, such as paracetamol and NSAIDs, and current clinical relevance.
Out of 126 eligible studies identified, 53 RCTs and seven systematic review or meta-analyses met the inclusion criteria. Pre-operative and intra-operative interventions that improved postoperative pain were paracetamol, NSAIDs, intravenous dexmedetomidine infusion, regional analgesia techniques, including incision-site infiltration, scalp nerve block and acupuncture. Limited evidence was found for flupirtine, intra-operative magnesium sulphate infusion, intra-operative lidocaine infusion, infiltration adjuvants (hyaluronidase, dexamethasone and α-adrenergic agonist added to local anaesthetic solution). No evidence was found for metamizole, postoperative subcutaneous sumatriptan, pre-operative oral vitamin D, bilateral maxillary block or superficial cervical plexus block.
The analgesic regimen for craniotomy should include paracetamol, NSAIDs, intravenous dexmedetomidine infusion and a regional analgesic technique (either incision-site infiltration or scalp nerve block), with opioids as rescue analgesics. Further RCTs are required to confirm the influence of the recommended analgesic regimen on postoperative pain relief.
Keywords
Humans, Pain Management/methods, Dexmedetomidine, Acetaminophen, Analgesics/therapeutic use, Pain, Postoperative/diagnosis, Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy, Pain, Postoperative/etiology, Craniotomy/adverse effects, Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use
Pubmed
Open Access
Yes
Create date
15/01/2024 16:57
Last modification date
17/01/2024 8:15
Usage data