Acute Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding in an Emergency Department and Performance of the SHA<sub>2</sub>PE Score: A Retrospective Observational Study.

Details

Ressource 1Download: 34884177_BIB_1A28C0872140.pdf (433.34 [Ko])
State: Public
Version: Final published version
License: CC BY 4.0
Serval ID
serval:BIB_1A28C0872140
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Acute Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding in an Emergency Department and Performance of the SHA<sub>2</sub>PE Score: A Retrospective Observational Study.
Journal
Journal of clinical medicine
Author(s)
Cerruti T., Maillard M.H., Hugli O.
ISSN
2077-0383 (Print)
ISSN-L
2077-0383
Publication state
Published
Issued date
23/11/2021
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
10
Number
23
Pages
5476
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: epublish
Abstract
Lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB) is a frequent cause of emergency department (ED) consultation, leading to investigations but rarely to urgent therapeutic interventions. The SHA <sub>2</sub> PE score aims to predict the risk of hospital-based intervention, but has never been externally validated. The aim of our single-center retrospective study was to describe patients consulting our ED for LGIB and to test the validity of the SHA <sub>2</sub> PE score. We included 251 adult patients who consulted in 2017 for hematochezia of <24 h duration; 53% were male, and the median age was 54 years. The most frequent cause of LGIB was unknown (38%), followed by diverticular disease and hemorrhoids (14%); 20% had an intervention. Compared with the no-intervention group, the intervention group was 26.5 years older, had more frequent bleeding in the ED (47% vs. 8%) and more frequent hypotension (8.2% vs. 1.1%), more often received antiplatelet drugs (43% vs. 18%) and anticoagulation therapy (28% vs. 9.5%), more often had a hemoglobin level of <10.5 g/dl (49% vs. 6.2%) on admission, and had greater in-hospital mortality (8.2% vs. 0.5%) (all p < 0.05). The interventions included transfusion (65%), endoscopic hemostasis (47%), embolization (8.2%), and surgery (4%). The SHA <sub>2</sub> PE score predicted an intervention with sensitivity of 71% (95% confidence interval: 66-83%), specificity of 81% (74-86%), and positive and negative predictive values of 53% (40-65%) and 90% (84-95%), respectively. SHA <sub>2</sub> PE performance was inferior to that in the original study, with a 1 in 10 chance of erroneously discharging a patient for outpatient intervention. Larger prospective validation studies are needed before the SHA <sub>2</sub> PE score can be recommended to guide LGIB patient management in the ED.
Keywords
hematochezia, lower gastrointestinal bleeding, score
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
20/12/2021 14:44
Last modification date
23/01/2024 8:21
Usage data