NovoTTF-100A versus physician's choice chemotherapy in recurrent glioblastoma: A randomised phase III trial of a novel treatment modality.

Details

Serval ID
serval:BIB_19BA91542495
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
NovoTTF-100A versus physician's choice chemotherapy in recurrent glioblastoma: A randomised phase III trial of a novel treatment modality.
Journal
European Journal of Cancer
Author(s)
Stupp R., Wong E.T., Kanner A.A., Steinberg D., Engelhard H., Heidecke V., Kirson E.D., Taillibert S., Liebermann F., Dbalý V., Ram Z., Villano J.L., Rainov N., Weinberg U., Schiff D., Kunschner L., Raizer J., Honnorat J., Sloan A., Malkin M., Landolfi J.C., Payer F., Mehdorn M., Weil R.J., Pannullo S.C., Westphal M., Smrcka M., Chin L., Kostron H., Hofer S., Bruce J., Cosgrove R., Paleologous N., Palti Y., Gutin P.H.
ISSN
1879-0852 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0959-8049
Publication state
Published
Issued date
2012
Volume
48
Number
14
Pages
2192-2202
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Abstract
PURPOSE: NovoTTF-100A is a portable device delivering low-intensity, intermediate frequency electric fields via non-invasive, transducer arrays. Tumour Treatment Fields (TTF), a completely new therapeutic modality in cancer treatment, physically interfere with cell division.
METHODS: Phase III trial of chemotherapy-free treatment of NovoTTF (20-24h/day) versus active chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Primary end-point was improvement of overall survival.
RESULTS: Patients (median age 54years (range 23-80), Karnofsky performance status 80% (range 50-100) were randomised to TTF alone (n=120) or active chemotherapy control (n=117). Number of prior treatments was two (range 1-6). Median survival was 6.6 versus 6.0months (hazard ratio 0.86 [95% CI 0.66-1.12]; p=0.27), 1-year survival rate was 20% and 20%, progression-free survival rate at 6months was 21.4% and 15.1% (p=0.13), respectively in TTF and active control patients. Responses were more common in the TTF arm (14% versus 9.6%, p=0.19). The TTF-related adverse events were mild (14%) to moderate (2%) skin rash beneath the transducer arrays. Severe adverse events occurred in 6% and 16% (p=0.022) of patients treated with TTF and chemotherapy, respectively. Quality of life analyses favoured TTF therapy in most domains.
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first controlled trial evaluating an entirely novel cancer treatment modality delivering electric fields rather than chemotherapy. No improvement in overall survival was demonstrated, however efficacy and activity with this chemotherapy-free treatment device appears comparable to chemotherapy regimens that are commonly used for recurrent glioblastoma. Toxicity and quality of life clearly favoured TTF.
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
27/09/2012 19:07
Last modification date
20/08/2019 13:50
Usage data