The different types of internal hernia after laparoscopic Roux-En-Y gastric by-pass for morbid obesity: MDCT features [C-419]

Details

Serval ID
serval:BIB_173E78A6A669
Type
Inproceedings: an article in a conference proceedings.
Publication sub-type
Abstract (Abstract): shot summary in a article that contain essentials elements presented during a scientific conference, lecture or from a poster.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
The different types of internal hernia after laparoscopic Roux-En-Y gastric by-pass for morbid obesity: MDCT features [C-419]
Title of the conference
ECR 2009 Book of Abstracts
Author(s)
Kawkabani A., Paroz A., Romy S., Sutter M., Denys A., Schnyder P., Schmidt S.
Address
March 6-10, Vienna, Austria
ISBN
0938-7994
Publication state
Published
Issued date
2009
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
19
Series
European Radiology
Pages
S424
Language
english
Abstract
Learning Objectives: 1. To provide an overview of the different types of internal hernia (IH) occurring after laparoscopic Roux‑en‑Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP) for morbid obesity. 2. To describe correspondent MDCT features in relation with the underlying anatomical landmarks in order to differentiate their localisation and to direct the surgeon during following laparoscopic closure of mesenteric defects. Background: LRYGBP for morbid obesity is associated with less perioperative complications, shorter hospital stay and a more rapid recovery compared with the open surgical procedure. However, a relatively high incidence of IH is seen that may be due to the laparoscopic approach, but also caused by rapid weight loss with consecutive loosening of the mesenteric sutures.
Procedure Details: After briefly reviewing the surgical procedure of LRYGBP (ante‑ versus retrocolic), we describe the exact anatomical landmarks of the different types of IH occurring at any time after operation: They are caused by surgical defects at the level of the transverse colon mesentery, at the Petersen's space, which represents an opening between the mesocolon and jejunal mesentery, or at the entero‑enterostomy site. Typical MDCT features of each IH type in axial and coronal planes as well as targeted vascular reconstructions are demonstrated.
Conclusion: Exact knowledge about underlying pathophysiology and anatomical landmarks is essential for distinguishing the different types of IH occurring after LRYGBP on MDCT, since radiological features are difficult to recognize and may even overlap. The radiologist should be aware of the potential anatomic sites to ensure subsequent straightforward laparoscopic exploration.
Create date
19/03/2009 15:25
Last modification date
20/08/2019 12:47
Usage data