Refractory Status Epilepticus: Risk Factors and Analysis of Intubation in the Multicenter SENSE Registry.
Details
Serval ID
serval:BIB_15C837BB1AF8
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Refractory Status Epilepticus: Risk Factors and Analysis of Intubation in the Multicenter SENSE Registry.
Journal
Neurology
ISSN
1526-632X (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0028-3878
Publication state
Published
Issued date
18/10/2022
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
99
Number
16
Pages
e1824-e1834
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Multicenter Study ; Journal Article
Publication Status: ppublish
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
Refractory status epilepticus (RSE) bears significant morbidity and mortality. Therapy escalation and in some cases intubation are recommended. Most existing studies are retrospective and focus on intensive care units. We aimed to describe routine-care management and analyze determinants of RSE development and outcomes in a large multicenter cohort.
We performed post hoc analysis of an observational, cohort study, which prospectively registered all consecutive adults with SE at 9 centers from 3 central European countries. Only incident episodes were included. Ongoing SE despite 2 antiseizure medications was defined as RSE. Patients intubated during first-line or second-line treatments were excluded. Variables investigated included demographics, severity (Status Epilepticus Severity Score), etiology, and guideline-compliant treatment (defined as fixed minimum doses). Outcome parameters included survival and mRS at baseline, and discharge (good: 0-2, or absence of worsening compared with prehospitalization).
Among 1,179 SE episodes from 1,049 adults, 996 patients were eligible (median age: 70 years, 52% female), of which 545 (54.7%) developed RSE. RSE was associated with higher baseline mRS (p < 0.001) and treatment deviation from guidelines (p < 0.001, OR 0.09; 95% CI 0.06-0.1). Good outcomes were observed in 52.7% of refractory patients, correlating with lower status epilepticus severity (p < 0.001), absence of acute etiology (p < 0.001, OR 0.5; 95% CI 0.3-0.7), adequate first-line benzodiazepine dose (p < 0.001, OR 2.5; 95% CI 1.6-4.0), shorter durations of SE and hospitalization (both p < 0.001), and lack of intubation (p < 0.001, OR 0.4; 95% CI 0.3-0.6). Most (71.7%) refractory patients were not intubated. Intubation was associated with younger age (p = 0.006), more severe consciousness disturbances (p < 0.001, OR 3.2; 95% CI 2.1-4.8), more severe SE types (p < 0.001), higher severity score (p = 0.009), acute etiologies (p = 0.01, OR 1.6; 95% CI 1.1-2.4), more antiseizure medications (p < 0.001), initial treatment after shorter latency (p = 0.01), worse outcomes (p < 0.001, OR 0.4; 95% CI 0.4-0.6), and longer hospitalizations (p < 0.001).
Variables associated with RSE were identified, some potentially preventable. More than 70% of RSE were treated without intubation, suggesting that focal RSE without deep impairment of consciousness, in older patients, may be successfully treated outside ICUs.
Original cohort study registered at the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00000725).
We performed post hoc analysis of an observational, cohort study, which prospectively registered all consecutive adults with SE at 9 centers from 3 central European countries. Only incident episodes were included. Ongoing SE despite 2 antiseizure medications was defined as RSE. Patients intubated during first-line or second-line treatments were excluded. Variables investigated included demographics, severity (Status Epilepticus Severity Score), etiology, and guideline-compliant treatment (defined as fixed minimum doses). Outcome parameters included survival and mRS at baseline, and discharge (good: 0-2, or absence of worsening compared with prehospitalization).
Among 1,179 SE episodes from 1,049 adults, 996 patients were eligible (median age: 70 years, 52% female), of which 545 (54.7%) developed RSE. RSE was associated with higher baseline mRS (p < 0.001) and treatment deviation from guidelines (p < 0.001, OR 0.09; 95% CI 0.06-0.1). Good outcomes were observed in 52.7% of refractory patients, correlating with lower status epilepticus severity (p < 0.001), absence of acute etiology (p < 0.001, OR 0.5; 95% CI 0.3-0.7), adequate first-line benzodiazepine dose (p < 0.001, OR 2.5; 95% CI 1.6-4.0), shorter durations of SE and hospitalization (both p < 0.001), and lack of intubation (p < 0.001, OR 0.4; 95% CI 0.3-0.6). Most (71.7%) refractory patients were not intubated. Intubation was associated with younger age (p = 0.006), more severe consciousness disturbances (p < 0.001, OR 3.2; 95% CI 2.1-4.8), more severe SE types (p < 0.001), higher severity score (p = 0.009), acute etiologies (p = 0.01, OR 1.6; 95% CI 1.1-2.4), more antiseizure medications (p < 0.001), initial treatment after shorter latency (p = 0.01), worse outcomes (p < 0.001, OR 0.4; 95% CI 0.4-0.6), and longer hospitalizations (p < 0.001).
Variables associated with RSE were identified, some potentially preventable. More than 70% of RSE were treated without intubation, suggesting that focal RSE without deep impairment of consciousness, in older patients, may be successfully treated outside ICUs.
Original cohort study registered at the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00000725).
Keywords
Adult, Humans, Female, Aged, Male, Retrospective Studies, Cohort Studies, Anticonvulsants/therapeutic use, Status Epilepticus/therapy, Status Epilepticus/drug therapy, Risk Factors, Registries, Intubation, Intratracheal/adverse effects
Pubmed
Web of science
Create date
29/11/2022 11:32
Last modification date
18/12/2024 7:11