Quality indicators of clinical cancer care (QC3) in colorectal cancer.

Details

Serval ID
serval:BIB_159DD305BFB2
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Title
Quality indicators of clinical cancer care (QC3) in colorectal cancer.
Journal
BMJ open
Author(s)
Bianchi V., Spitale A., Ortelli L., Mazzucchelli L., Bordoni A.
Working group(s)
QC3 CRC Working Group
Contributor(s)
Barizzi J., Bihl F., Christoforidis D., Franzetti-Pellanda A., Giovanella L., Heinkel J., Maffei M., Mazzucchelli L., Miazza B., Pelloni A., Quattropani C., Rosso R., Saletti P., Valli M.C., Varini M., Wyttenbach R.
ISSN
2044-6055 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
2044-6055
Publication state
Published
Issued date
2013
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
3
Number
7
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: epublish
Abstract
Assessing the quality of cancer care (QoCC) has become increasingly important to providers, regulators and purchasers of care worldwide. The aim of this study was to develop evidence-based quality indicators (QIs) for colorectal cancer (CRC) to be applied in a population-based setting.
A comprehensive evidence-based literature search was performed to identify the initial list of QIs, which were then selected and developed using a two-step-modified Delphi process involving two multidisciplinary expert panels with expertise in CRC care, quality of care and epidemiology.
The QIs of the clinical cancer care (QC3) population-based project, which involves all the public and private hospitals and clinics present on the territory of Canton Ticino (South Switzerland).
Ticino Cancer Registry, The Colorectal Cancer Working Group (CRC-WG) and the external academic Advisory Board (AB).
Set of QIs which encompass the whole diagnostic-treatment process of CRC.
Of the 149 QIs that emerged from 181 sources of literature, 104 were selected during the in-person meeting of CRC-WG. During the Delphi process, CRC-WG shortened the list to 89 QI. AB finally validated 27 QIs according to the phase of care: diagnosis (N=6), pathology (N=3), treatment (N=16) and outcome (N=2).
Using the validated Delphi methodology, including a literature review of the evidence and integration of expert opinions from local clinicians and international experts, we were able to develop a list of QIs to assess QoCC for CRC. This will hopefully guarantee feasibility of data retrieval, as well as acceptance and translation of QIs into the daily clinical practice to improve QoCC. Moreover, evidence-based selected QIs allow one to assess immediate changes and improvements in the diagnostic-therapeutic process that could be translated into a short-term benefit for patients with a possible gain both in overall and disease-free survival.
Keywords
Gastrointestinal tumours < Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal tumours < Oncology, Qualitative Research, Quality in health care < Health Services Administration & Management
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
11/10/2019 7:46
Last modification date
16/11/2019 6:26
Usage data