Should we treat Blastocystis sp.? A double-blind placebo-controlled randomized pilot trial.

Details

Ressource 1Request a copy Under indefinite embargo.
UNIL restricted access
State: Public
Version: author
License: Not specified
Serval ID
serval:BIB_112DD01B45D8
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Should we treat Blastocystis sp.? A double-blind placebo-controlled randomized pilot trial.
Journal
Journal of travel medicine
Author(s)
Cobuccio L.G., Laurent M., Gardiol C., Wampfler R., Poppert S., Senn N., Eperon G., Genton B., Locatelli I., de Vallière S.
ISSN
1708-8305 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1195-1982
Publication state
Published
Issued date
18/02/2023
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
30
Number
1
Pages
taac143
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Randomized Controlled Trial ; Journal Article
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
Blastocystis sp. is a worldwide-distributed protist colonizing the guts of humans and a great variety of animals. It is unclear whether it is just a commensal or an infectious parasite that prompts eradication.The main objective of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of metronidazole in patients with gastrointestinal symptoms harbouring only Blastocystis sp. In addition, we explored whether Blastocystis subtype or concomitant parasitic infection detected by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) may influence treatment outcome.
We included adults with persistent gastrointestinal symptoms (>14 days) visiting a primary care physician and in whom stool microscopy revealed only Blastocystis sp. Eligible patients were randomized to receive 10 days of metronidazole or placebo, followed by a crossover if still symptomatic. The primary outcome was normal stool consistency. Secondary outcomes were the changes in other abdominal symptoms (bloating, flatulence, abdominal pain, number of daily bowel movements) and general wellbeing. After the clinical phase of the study, Blastocystis subtypes were determined by PCR sequencing and stool samples were tested for 11 other protozoa with an in-house PCR.
We screened 581 outpatients for inclusion, of which 50 met the eligibility criteria. There was no difference in the primary outcome, nor any of the secondary outcomes between the subjects treated with metronidazole and placebo.The most frequent Blastocystis subtypes were ST4 (11/36) and ST2 (10/36). The in-house PCR was positive for other protozoa in 25% (10/40) of the patients. We identified Dientamoeba fragilis in 5, Entamoeba dispar in 3 and Cyclospora cayetanensis in 2 patients. Stratified analysis according to Blastocystis subtype or the presence of other protozoa showed no significant difference in treatment outcome with metronidazole or placebo.
Among patients infected with Blastocystis sp., metronidazole, compared with placebo, was not better in improving gastrointestinal symptoms, irrespective of subtype or microscopically undetected coinfection with other protozoa.
Keywords
Adult, Animals, Humans, Blastocystis, Blastocystis Infections/drug therapy, Blastocystis Infections/parasitology, Metronidazole/therapeutic use, Pilot Projects, Gastrointestinal Diseases, Feces, Blastocystis treatment, blastocystis PCR, blastocystis diagnosis, blastocystis metronidazole, blastocystis molecular diagnosis, protozoa PCR, stool parasites
Pubmed
Web of science
Create date
05/12/2022 16:21
Last modification date
20/07/2023 6:57
Usage data