Can we assess healing of surgically treated long bone fractures on radiograph?
Details
Serval ID
serval:BIB_0E55F4A4ED55
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Can we assess healing of surgically treated long bone fractures on radiograph?
Journal
Diagnostic and interventional imaging
ISSN
2211-5684 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
2211-5684
Publication state
Published
Issued date
06/2018
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
99
Number
6
Pages
381-386
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: ppublish
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
To determine the frequency and causes for limitations in the radiographic evaluation of surgically treated long bone fractures.
Six readers separately scored 140 sets of antero-posterior (AP) and lateral radiographs of surgically treated long bone fractures, using a radiographic union score (RUS). We determined the rate of assessability of the fracture edges at each of the four cortical segments (n=560) seen tangentially on the two radiographs and the causes for non-assessability. The rate of feasibility of the RUS (more than two fracture edges assessable per fracture) was determined and compared according to different parameters.
Fracture edges were visible in 71% to 81% of the 560 cortical segments. Metal hardware superimposition was the most frequent cause for non-assessability (79-95%). RUS values could be calculated in 58% to 75% of fractures. Scoring was statistically significantly less frequently calculable in plated (31-56%) than in nailed fractures (90-97%), in distal (47-61%) than in proximal (78-89%) bones and in upper (27-49%) than in lower (76-91%) limb bones (P≤0.01).
The type of stabilization hardware is the main limiting factor in the radiographic assessment of surgically treated long bone fractures. Scoring was feasible in only 31% to 56% of plated fractures.
Six readers separately scored 140 sets of antero-posterior (AP) and lateral radiographs of surgically treated long bone fractures, using a radiographic union score (RUS). We determined the rate of assessability of the fracture edges at each of the four cortical segments (n=560) seen tangentially on the two radiographs and the causes for non-assessability. The rate of feasibility of the RUS (more than two fracture edges assessable per fracture) was determined and compared according to different parameters.
Fracture edges were visible in 71% to 81% of the 560 cortical segments. Metal hardware superimposition was the most frequent cause for non-assessability (79-95%). RUS values could be calculated in 58% to 75% of fractures. Scoring was statistically significantly less frequently calculable in plated (31-56%) than in nailed fractures (90-97%), in distal (47-61%) than in proximal (78-89%) bones and in upper (27-49%) than in lower (76-91%) limb bones (P≤0.01).
The type of stabilization hardware is the main limiting factor in the radiographic assessment of surgically treated long bone fractures. Scoring was feasible in only 31% to 56% of plated fractures.
Keywords
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Female, Fracture Healing, Fractures, Bone/diagnostic imaging, Fractures, Bone/surgery, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Observer Variation, Radiography, Young Adult, Bone, Bone fracture, Healing, Radiographs, Variability study
Pubmed
Web of science
Create date
22/03/2018 18:02
Last modification date
20/08/2019 12:35