Interventions to Promote Fundamental Movement Skills in Childcare and Kindergarten: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Details

Ressource 1Download: 28386652_BIB_08AB286B4550.pdf (1388.46 [Ko])
State: Public
Version: Final published version
License: CC BY 4.0
Serval ID
serval:BIB_08AB286B4550
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Interventions to Promote Fundamental Movement Skills in Childcare and Kindergarten: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Journal
Sports medicine
Author(s)
Wick K., Leeger-Aschmann C.S., Monn N.D., Radtke T., Ott L.V., Rebholz C.E., Cruz S., Gerber N., Schmutz E.A., Puder J.J., Munsch S., Kakebeeke T.H., Jenni O.G., Granacher U., Kriemler S.
ISSN
1179-2035 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0112-1642
Publication state
Published
Issued date
10/2017
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
47
Number
10
Pages
2045-2068
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article ; Meta-Analysis ; Review ; Systematic Review
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
Proficiency in fundamental movement skills (FMS) lays the foundation for being physically active and developing more complex motor skills. Improving these motor skills may provide enhanced opportunities for the development of a variety of perceptual, social, and cognitive skills.
The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the effects of FMS interventions on actual FMS, targeting typically developing young children.
Searches in seven databases (CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science) up to August 2015 were completed. Trials with children (aged 2-6 years) in childcare or kindergarten settings that applied FMS-enhancing intervention programs of at least 4 weeks and meeting the inclusion criteria were included. Standardized data extraction forms were used. Risk of bias was assessed using a standard scoring scheme (Effective Public Health Practice Project-Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies [EPHPP]). We calculated effects on overall FMS, object control and locomotor subscales (OCS and LMS) by weighted standardized mean differences (SMD <sub>between</sub> ) using random-effects models. Certainty in training effects was evaluated using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation System).
Thirty trials (15 randomized controlled trials and 15 controlled trials) involving 6126 preschoolers (aged 3.3-5.5 years) revealed significant differences among groups in favor of the intervention group (INT) with small-to-large effects on overall FMS (SMD <sub>between</sub> 0.46), OCS (SMD <sub>between</sub> 1.36), and LMS (SMD <sub>between</sub> 0.94). Our certainty in the treatment estimates based on GRADE is very low.
Although there is relevant effectiveness of programs to improve FMS proficiency in healthy young children, they need to be interpreted with care as they are based on low-quality evidence and immediate post-intervention effects without long-term follow-up.
Keywords
Child, Child, Preschool, Exercise, Humans, Motor Activity/physiology, Motor Skills/physiology, Movement/physiology, Schools, Students, Fundamental Movement Skill, High Effect Size, Locomotor Skill, Motivational Climate, Motor Skill
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
25/04/2017 18:03
Last modification date
30/04/2021 7:08
Usage data