Percutaneous endovascular salvage techniques for implanted venous access device dysfunction.

Details

Serval ID
serval:BIB_06AA705D6596
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Percutaneous endovascular salvage techniques for implanted venous access device dysfunction.
Journal
Cardiovascular and interventional radiology
Author(s)
Breault S., Glauser F., Babaker M., Doenz F., Qanadli S.D.
ISSN
1432-086X (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0174-1551
Publication state
Published
Issued date
06/2015
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
38
Number
3
Pages
642-650
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
Implanted venous access devices (IVADs) are often used in patients who require long-term intravenous drug administration. The most common causes of device dysfunction include occlusion by fibrin sheath and/or catheter adherence to the vessel wall. We present percutaneous endovascular salvage techniques to restore function in occluded catheters. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of these techniques.
Through a femoral or brachial venous access, a snare is used to remove fibrin sheath around the IVAD catheter tip. If device dysfunction is caused by catheter adherences to the vessel wall, a new "mechanical adhesiolysis" maneuver was performed. IVAD salvage procedures performed between 2005 and 2013 were analyzed. Data included clinical background, catheter tip position, success rate, recurrence, and rate of complication.
Eighty-eight salvage procedures were performed in 80 patients, mostly women (52.5 %), with a mean age of 54 years. Only a minority (17.5 %) of evaluated catheters were located at an optimal position (i.e., cavoatrial junction ±1 cm). Mechanical adhesiolysis or other additional maneuvers were used in 21 cases (24 %). Overall technical success rate was 93.2 %. Malposition and/or vessel wall adherences were the main cause of technical failure. No complications were noted.
These IVAD salvage techniques are safe and efficient. When a catheter is adherent to the vessel wall, mechanical adhesiolysis maneuvers allow catheter mobilization and a greater success rate with no additional risk. In patients who still require long-term use of their IVAD, these procedures can be performed safely to avoid catheter replacement.

Keywords
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Catheterization, Central Venous/instrumentation, Catheters, Indwelling, Endovascular Procedures/instrumentation, Endovascular Procedures/methods, Equipment Failure, Feasibility Studies, Female, Fibrin, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult
Pubmed
Create date
10/12/2014 10:28
Last modification date
20/08/2019 12:28
Usage data