Differential effect of long versus short wavelength light exposure on pupillary re-dilation in patients with outer retinal disease.
Details
Serval ID
serval:BIB_045F366C0B96
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Differential effect of long versus short wavelength light exposure on pupillary re-dilation in patients with outer retinal disease.
Journal
Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology
ISSN
1442-9071 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1442-6404
Publication state
Published
Issued date
2012
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
40
Number
1
Pages
e16-e24
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Comparative Study ; Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In patients with outer retinal degeneration, a differential pupil response to long wavelength (red) versus short wavelength (blue) light stimulation has been previously observed. The goal of this study was to quantify differences in the pupillary re-dilation following exposure to red versus blue light in patients with outer retinal disease and compare them with patients with optic neuropathy and with healthy subjects.
DESIGN: Prospective comparative cohort study.
PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-three patients with outer retinal disease, 13 patients with optic neuropathy and 14 normal subjects.
METHODS: Subjects were tested using continuous red and blue light stimulation at three intensities (1, 10 and 100 cd/m2) for 13 s per intensity. Pupillary re-dilation dynamics following the brightest intensity was analysed and compared between the three groups.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The parameters of pupil re-dilation used in this study were: time to recover 90% of baseline size; mean pupil size at early and late phases of re-dilation; and differential re-dilation time for blue versus red light.
RESULTS: Patients with outer retinal disease showed a pupil that tended to stay smaller after light termination and thus had a longer time to recovery. The differential re-dilation time was significantly greater in patients with outer retinal disease (median = 28.0 s, P < 0.0001) compared with controls and patients with optic neuropathy.
CONCLUSIONS: A differential response of pupil re-dilation following red versus blue light stimulation is present in patients with outer retinal disease but is not found in normal eyes or among patients with visual loss from optic neuropathy.
DESIGN: Prospective comparative cohort study.
PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-three patients with outer retinal disease, 13 patients with optic neuropathy and 14 normal subjects.
METHODS: Subjects were tested using continuous red and blue light stimulation at three intensities (1, 10 and 100 cd/m2) for 13 s per intensity. Pupillary re-dilation dynamics following the brightest intensity was analysed and compared between the three groups.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The parameters of pupil re-dilation used in this study were: time to recover 90% of baseline size; mean pupil size at early and late phases of re-dilation; and differential re-dilation time for blue versus red light.
RESULTS: Patients with outer retinal disease showed a pupil that tended to stay smaller after light termination and thus had a longer time to recovery. The differential re-dilation time was significantly greater in patients with outer retinal disease (median = 28.0 s, P < 0.0001) compared with controls and patients with optic neuropathy.
CONCLUSIONS: A differential response of pupil re-dilation following red versus blue light stimulation is present in patients with outer retinal disease but is not found in normal eyes or among patients with visual loss from optic neuropathy.
Keywords
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Child, Female, Humans, Light, Male, Middle Aged, Optic Nerve Diseases/physiopathology, Photic Stimulation, Prospective Studies, Pupil/radiation effects, Reflex, Pupillary/physiology, Retinal Degeneration/physiopathology, Visual Field Tests, Visual Fields/physiology
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
20/12/2011 10:27
Last modification date
20/08/2019 12:26