Participation rates for organized colorectal cancer screening programmes: an international comparison.

Details

Serval ID
serval:BIB_01D10DFF2A75
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Participation rates for organized colorectal cancer screening programmes: an international comparison.
Journal
Journal of Medical Screening
Author(s)
Klabunde C., Blom J., Bulliard J.L., Garcia M., Hagoel L., Mai V., Patnick J., Rozjabek H., Senore C., Törnberg S.
ISSN
1475-5793 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0969-1413
Publication state
Published
Issued date
2015
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
22
Number
3
Pages
119-126
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Comparative Study ; Journal Article
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Participation, an indicator of screening programme acceptance and effectiveness, varies widely in clinical trials and population-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programmes. We aimed to assess whether CRC screening participation rates can be compared across organized guaiac fecal occult blood test (G-FOBT)/fecal immunochemical test (FIT)-based programmes, and what factors influence these rates.
METHODS: Programme representatives from countries participating in the International Cancer Screening Network were surveyed to describe their G-FOBT/FIT-based CRC screening programmes, how screening participation is defined and measured, and to provide participation data for their most recent completed screening round.
RESULTS: Information was obtained from 15 programmes in 12 countries. Programmes varied in size, reach, maturity, target age groups, exclusions, type of test kit, method of providing test kits and use, and frequency of reminders. Coverage by invitation ranged from 30-100%, coverage by the screening programme from 7-67.7%, overall uptake/participation rate from 7-67.7%, and first invitation participation from 7-64.3%. Participation rates generally increased with age and were higher among women than men and for subsequent compared with first invitation participation.
CONCLUSION: Comparisons among CRC screening programmes should be made cautiously, given differences in organization, target populations, and interpretation of indicators. More meaningful comparisons are possible if rates are calculated across a uniform age range, by gender, and separately for people invited for the first time vs. previously.
Keywords
Aged, Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis, Data Collection, Early Detection of Cancer/methods, Feces, Female, Guaiac, Humans, International Cooperation, Male, Mass Screening/methods, Middle Aged, Occult Blood, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Patient Participation, Patient Selection, Sex Factors, Surveys and Questionnaires
Pubmed
Web of science
Create date
04/06/2015 10:44
Last modification date
20/08/2019 13:24
Usage data